printer friendly format sponsored by:
The New Media Department of The Post and Courier

THURSDAY, APRIL 28, 2005 12:00 AM

Psychological screening for police part of S.C. budget battle

BY RON MENCHACA AND GLENN SMITH
Of The Post and Courier Staff

South Carolina's ability to screen police applicants for mental stability hinges on whether Senate leaders decide it's worthy of state funding.

The state's psychological screening service fell victim to budget cuts in 2003, even though it helped weed out nearly one-third of police applicants who lacked the mental stability for the profession.

The recent Post and Courier series "Tarnished Badges" found that some police departments have since abandoned the practice altogether.

House leaders were concerned enough about the newspaper's findings that they amended their budget last month to revive the evaluation program.

The Senate, however, didn't follow suit. The Senate's version of the budget passed Tuesday included no money for reinstating the program at the state Criminal Justice Academy in Columbia.

But Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell said the issue has not been forgotten. He said he's confident the screening service will be included in a final version of the state's $5.8 billion budget.

"I think it's a good thing," said McConnell, R-Charleston. "I think it helps us understand who is serving and whether they are qualified to serve."

State Rep. Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, who chairs the House Ways and Means Committee, said he'll restore the $500,000 when the House gets another crack at the budget next month. He said he'd also fight to keep the money in place when lawmakers from the two chambers huddle to iron out differences in their spending plans.

While most of the state's larger law enforcement agencies, including Charleston and North Charleston police, pay for screenings out of their own budgets, many smaller departments relied on the academy to foot most of the bill. The same testing that the state offered for $25 to $35 can cost $200 or more on the open market.

Although the House budget provides only enough money to fund the screening unit and its staff for one year, Academy Director William Neill said he'll take what he can get. "It's that important," he said.

Still, the screening service will remain vulnerable to the budget ax until the state mandates psychological evaluations for police applicants.

The lack of a mandate in South Carolina has had obvious results: Fewer than 100 of the state's 280 police agencies administered the tests as part of their application process, a 2001 academy survey found.

Academy officials don't know how many of the more than 1,000 new officers in South Carolina each year go untested.

But the lack of screening is only part of the problem. Gov. Mark Sanford has called for a task force to examine gaps in state law that have allowed troubled police officers to remain in law enforcement, despite histories of misconduct and criminal behavior. He appointed Director of Public Safety James Schweitzer to head the committee, which could hold its first meeting next month.

The Department of Public Safety is the parent organization of the academy, which is responsible for training and tracking some 14,000 law enforcement officers.

Some have criticized the academy's effectiveness, saying it has been neglected since 1993 when it was absorbed by Public Safety, where it competes for funding and resources with that agency's many other divisions.

Bills filed in the House and Senate on Wednesday would restore some authority to a 17-member training council that oversaw academy decisions before the agency was folded into the Public Safety Department.

 

Additional Stories

Hectic day at S.C. Statehouse

Psychological screening for police part of S.C. budget battle

Gay couple, gay marriage foe discuss proposed amendment

Tuition tax credit plan appears dead this year

House backs bill on liquor deliveries

LEGISLATIVE REPORT


This article was printed via the web on 4/29/2005 12:11:30 PM . This article
appeared in The Post and Courier and updated online at Charleston.net on Thursday, April 28, 2005.