Date Published: October 30, 2005
Delegation should take lead on career center
Rep. Murrell Smith came to the rescue of
the Sumter community this week when he sought an opinion on
which body has the authority to change the governance of the
Sumter County Career Center.
Johnathan Bryan, attorney
for the county, had offered his opinion, saying that under the
law of home rule, Sumter County Council could re-align the
center the way it wanted to. The opinion solicited by Smith
from the South Carolina House Judiciary Committee contradicted
Bryan’s, stating that the General Assembly is the only body
with that authority.
The career center, once a thriving
part of the local education system, has been the focus of
local debate for the last month and a point of contention for
many industrial leaders for well beyond that. Everyone agrees
that the vocational center will never return to its former
glory under its current setup, which includes a director and a
board that consists of members of School Districts 2 and 17
and the community. There are several ex-officio members,
including the superintendents from both districts and the
president of Central Carolina Technical College.
The
plans being debated are turning the governance over to Central
Carolina, which operates the F.E. Dubose Center in Manning, or
to the district superintendents. Turning it over to CCTC was
originally brought before county council by Councilman Charles
Edens. It was endorsed in an editorial by this paper two weeks
ago and by the Greater Sumter Chamber of
Commerce.
Giving the authority to the superintendents
is an option apparently only supported by county council — by
a slim margin.
Why does county council support this
concept? In public meetings and in an article published in
The Item on Oct. 29, the superintendents offered no
real plan of action, only that they want to run it. You would
think that if they wanted the chance, they would be standing
on the roof tops and shouting out what they believe will
work.
A reasonable assumption is they haven’t because
they don’t know. And that’s OK because they’re not the only
ones. But they should understand that it’s their
responsibility to back away if they have no real
plan.
Two members of county council made interesting
comments at a recent meeting.
“I heard tonight that the
superintendents’ plates are full,” Roland Robinson said. “How
do you know?”
The answer to that question, Mr.
Robinson, is we don’t, but Baker and Jefferson do. It an
article published in The Item on March 13, Jefferson
said she works 70-plus hours a week. Baker said he worked 70
to 80 a week. When will they have time to not just operate the
career center but actually fix it? When it gets down to it,
when do they eat and sleep?
Eugene Baten said, “It is
their job and only their job to educate these
kids.”
That comment hardly needs shooting down, but
we’ll give it a try.
Superintendents play a vital role
in the world of academia, but the world of vocation is
altogether different. Training and educating a workforce is
hardly their area of expertise.
And while Smith might
have saved the day, the words of another legislator, Phil
Leventis, leave something to be desired. He said he hopes that
everyone can agree on a course of action, which will make all
of this bickering moot.
In the real world, what are the
chances that there will be a consensus on this
issue?
Those in government should govern. We are
speaking specifically about Sumter’s Legislative Delegation.
Their leadership in this situation is sorely
needed.
Again, that’s what they were elected to
do.
|

|
|

|
|