Executive reform
needed Even if Sharpe is innocent, his
charges show case for changes
Not to kick S.C. Agriculture Commissioner Charles Sharpe when
he's down, but his arrest on federal charges of extortion and money
laundering in connection with an illegal cockfighting ring does
provide a cautionary tale about South Carolina's messy handling of
executive functions.
In South Carolina, the agriculture commissioner is elected, with
only the members of the farm lobby ... truly understanding the
merits and drawbacks of the candidates.
And, once they're in office, the agriculture commissioner and
other minor state elective officials pretty much have a free hand to
do what they please without reprisal from voters or the press.
Because they play no policy-making role, they don't attract much
attention.
It would be unfair, obviously, for us to pass judgment on the
allegations against Sharpe, who has pleaded not guilty.
That's the job of a jury.
But it's hard to imagine that a secretary of agriculture who
worked for Gov. Mark Sanford -- or any S.C. governor since Strom
Thurmond -- could stray into a situation where the filing of such
serious federal charges was possible.
Since taking office last year, Sanford has sought to organize the
disparate elective offices that perform executive functions under
the governor's control ...
Even if nothing else comes of it, the Sharpe case should give
Sanford renewed incentive to demand these structural changes again
-- and legislators' renewed impetus to grant them.
|