COLUMBIA, S.C. - At the urging of Republican
Gov. Mark Sanford, lawmakers have begun discussing legislation that
would restructure state government.
Sen.s said Tuesday they would not rush action on the bills that
would eliminate some elected positions such as education
superintendent, agriculture commissioner and adjutant general and
instead direct the governor to appoint these officials.
Sen. Tommy Moore, D-Clearwater, said he wanted to know the
benefits of making major government changes through
restructuring.
Sanford championed executive branch restructuring during his
campaign last year against Democratic Gov. Jim Hodges, said
restructuring could eliminate government waste and cut costs.
Any structural overhaul of state government would result in
savings, said Sanford's spokesman, Will Folks.
"Specific numbers would require specific bills to result in
accurate savings projections," Folks said.
Eliminating elected positions would require a decision from
voters. Sen.s want to hold public hearings to inform voters about
the potential change and get their input.
Lawmakers have time to debate the issue, as a question would not
appear on a ballot until at least fall of 2004, said Sen. Larry
Martin, R-Pickens.
Restructuring is a priority, but Sanford wants input from the
Legislature, Folks said.
"I don't think there's anything wrong with taking our time,"
Folks said. "Change doesn't happen overnight, particularly change of
this magnitude."
It's likely to be a hotly debated issue. Even lawmakers and
constitutional officers disagree.
Allowing voters to elect constitutional officers keeps the
government "close to the people" and allows for checks and balances,
said Sonny Sanders, legislative liaison for the state treasurer's
office.
Secretary of State Mark Hammond also said he did not want to see
change.
"I know firsthand through my travels ... people support and
appreciate not only the secretary of state's office, but
constitutional officers in general," Hammond said.
But Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum, a Democrat,
likely would support restructuring, education officials say.
Policies on education could be centralized if the education
superintendent were appointed by the governor, rather than elected,
said Molly Spearman, the department's deputy superintendent for
governmental affairs.
In addition, many quality people are turned away from seeking the
superintendent post because of the expense and time involved in an
election, Spearman
said.