Attorney general
investigations flooring contract
Associated
Press
COLUMBIA, S.C. - An exclusive contract with a
company that provided carpeting and other flooring for state
buildings is under investigation by the attorney general's
office.
Trey Walker, a spokesman for Attorney General Henry McMaster,
said the office is "conducting a preliminary review of the state
carpet contract to determine if any action is warranted."
The investigation follows an audit that found state government
may have misspent millions of dollars on the contract with
Columbia-based Bonitz Flooring Group. The state paid Bonitz $35
million from 1998 to 2003.
The company said it made some pricing mistakes, but issued
refunds when they were found.
The state recently ended that contract under which Bonitz was
state government's sole supplier for carpet and other flooring.
School systems and local governments also used that contract to buy
carpet and flooring.
The 2004 audit found that Bonitz overcharged state agencies
$128,000 - money the company later refunded - on 150 of 285 projects
from February 1998 through December 2003. Bonitz was paid an
estimated $9 million for work on state projects that was not
competitively bid.
The audit also showed that carpet manufacturers jacked up prices
on state jobs, quoting up to $7 a square yard higher than they
charged private customers.
The audit did not say whether Bonitz acted improperly, but said
there was room for improvement from almost everyone involved in the
state's carpet contract.
In a written response to the audit, Bonitz said the problems have
been corrected. The company is employee-owned with 800 workers in
seven Southern states and Colorado.
In a statement to The (Columbia) State newspaper, Bonitz senior
vice president Larry Hutton said the company "stands behind our
performance on the statewide contract. The state of South Carolina
has received excellent quality in both products and services at a
competitive price."
The audit said the state could have saved money if it had
competitively bid the contracts.
The State Budget and Control Board, which oversees the carpet
contract, said it did not know how many other exclusive contracts
the state has. The state uses sole-source contracts to buy many
goods and services, ranging from mops to gasoline.
"Obviously, there are serious problems with the way the situation
has been managed," said Will Folks, a spokesman for Gov. Mark
Sanford.
Budget and Control spokesman Michael Sponhour said the agency
would conduct similar audits if "we receive such concerns about
another line of work."
"We want to make sure that taxpayers get the most for their
money," Sponhour said, adding all state contracts are subject to
regular audits.
Sanford has proposed restructuring the Budget and Control Board
and putting much of its responsibilities into a new Department of
Administration that would report to him.
The board is overseen by executive director Frank Fusco, but
ultimate responsibility lies with five of the state's top financial
leaders: Sanford, the heads of the House Ways and Means and Senate
Finance committees, state Treasurer Grady Patterson and Comptroller
General Richard Eckstrom.
"It goes back to what the governor said all along about the
Budget and Control Board: When you've got a five-headed monster
that's accountable to no one, this is what you end up with," Folks
said. "It's not something that would have been tolerated in a
cabinet-level administration."
For more than three years, a group of carpet dealers complained
the contract with Bonitz was costing the state money. The dealers
argued the state should scrap the statewide, five-year contract and
bid each project on a competitive basis.
That is what the state plans to do, Sponhour said. He said the
decision to end Bonitz's contract in June was not related to last
year's audit.
One of the carpet dealers who complained was Chip Salak, director
of new business development for McWaters Inc. of Columbia. Since the
Budget and Control Board ended the contract with Bonitz, McWaters
has won a carpeting job.
The audit "showed everything we had been talking about to the
State Budget and Control office ... legislators and other people we
have met with over these last few years," Salak said. The state
"fell asleep at the wheel on this contract.
"It is clear that the end-users' trust in the supplier was taken
advantage of. It is clear that the taxpayers of South Carolina have
been taken advantage of."
Clemson University director of facilities Bob Wells said he was
surprised when he learned Bonitz had overcharged his school more
than $116,000 on a carpeting job.
"They do a lot of carpet over here," Wells said. "For us, Bonitz
has been a very responsive company and have done a lot of work. They
always seem to do good work."
|