x-sender: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com x-receiver: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com Received: from mail pickup service by IQ12 with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:55:10 -0500 thread-index: AdBVO++yt/myote2T7W5CCK2vCEZeA== Thread-Topic: Small Town/County practice of selective law enforcement From: To: Subject: Small Town/County practice of selective law enforcement Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 17:55:10 -0500 Message-ID: <193A704F1FDA4F10AFF5D10802DD9467@IQ12> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Mar 2015 22:55:10.0791 (UTC) FILETIME=[EFC60D70:01D0553B] CUSTOM Mr. Ed Feather Writer/Blogger 903 Bromley EST Pine Hill NJ 08021 ROPD16@Comcast.net PRESS Small Town/County practice of selective law enforcement What is the Governor's Position on Small Towns and/or Counties practice of 'selective enforcement' or what may appear to some as, 'profiling', when deciding to whom to issue traffic citations in the State of South Carolina. For example, hypothetically, if the Dorchester County Sherriff's Department were to specifically target out of state drivers, who are 'more favorable targets' because they are less likely to travel back to the state to contest a citation in court, and therefore opt to pay the fine, (rather than have to deal with the time and expense involved, lost wages, etc.), while simultaneously allowing or, 'not as aggresively', pursuing local/state residents? Follow-up: What action(s) might the Governor take if she discovered such occurances existed on her watch? Lastly: Would the Governor be willing to be recorded stating her position and/or any comments? Thank you in advance for your expedious response. Respectfully, Ed Feather