Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for    




   • Front page
   • Metro
   • Sports

Thursday, Oct 27, 2005
  email this    print this    reprint or license this   
Posted on Thu, Oct. 27, 2005
 
 R E L A T E D   L I N K S 
 •  Sales tax exemptions (PDF)
 •  Survey: Should South Carolina raise the state sales tax by 2 cents as a way to cut property taxes by as much as one-half?

Senate may blow cap off car tax


Lawmakers consider ending $300 ceiling so they can trim levy on groceries as part of plan to cut property taxes in half



Staff Writer

The $300 cap on auto sales taxes — one of the most sacred cows of S.C. politics — could be a casualty of the Senate’s efforts to lower property taxes by 50 percent, but not without a fight.

Senators are looking for ways to reduce taxes on groceries by applying the sales tax to more items. That would make their overall tax reform plan less of a burden on needy residents who spend a larger portion of their income on food.

Some key leaders, including Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, R-Charleston, say raising or removing the cap on vehicle sales seems like a good place to start.

“It’s time to look at (the cap) and see if we can do something in the area of food,” McConnell said.

Under existing law, sales taxes on vehicles only apply to 5 percent of the purchase price or $300, whichever figure is lowest.

Critics of the cap have long derided it as regressive, meaning it disproportionately hits lower income buyers. That’s because the tax remains the same whether you buy a used Ford Escort off the lot or a brand new Mercedes.

Under the cap, put in place in 1984, the tax on car sales will generate an estimated $86 million this year. Sales taxes on vehicles in South Carolina are among the lowest in the nation.

Defenders of the current cap — largely the auto industry and its allies — are expected to push back.

“Here at Halloween time, I’m not sure if some of this so-called tax reform isn’t wearing a mask,” said Pat Watson, executive vice president of the S.C. Automobile Dealers Association, a trade group for new car dealers.

Watson says the $300 cap is fair because it treats all vehicles equally. Besides, Watson says, automobile owners already pay hefty sums in yearly property taxes on their vehicles.

That could change, cutting property tax bills on cars in half, if the Senate’s plan is enacted.

Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer has been a key opponent of lifting the cap. As the presiding officer of the Senate, Bauer has used procedural rulings to block previous attempts to raise the cap, most recently during lean budget years when lawmakers were scrounging around for more money.

Bauer, a former used car dealer, accepted nearly $35,000 in campaign contributions from auto dealers from April 1 through June 31, according to a filing with the State Ethics Commission. That was almost one-third of his total and far more than any other lawmaker during that same period.

Bauer could not be reached for comment Wednesday.

Proponents of a change say the state can collect millions by scrapping the cap.

One method could exempt the first few thousand dollars of a car’s price, thus making the tax on higher-end cars more expensive than on cheaper ones.

For example, if the cap were eliminated, and the first $1,000 of a car’s value was exempted from the 5-cent sales tax, that would raise about $92 million more.

The state also could raise the cap, which would bring in more revenue, but still be regressive. Increasing the cap to $600, for example, would bring in an additional $46 million each year, according to the state’s Board of Economic Advisors.

The elimination of the food tax is just a part of an overall debate to lower property taxes on homes, automobiles and other items by raising the statewide sales tax by 2 cents on the dollar.

Many lawmakers say food should be exempted from any sales tax because low-income consumers spend a larger portion of their paychecks on groceries.

At a recent public hearing in Lexington County, many in attendance voiced support for getting rid of the auto sales tax cap in exchange for lower grocery bills.

“If you’re going to tax us, tax us on our choices, not on what we have to have,” said Leo Wigham of Columbia.

But eliminating the food tax would require lawmakers to revisit current sales tax exemptions. Lawmakers are mum about which other exemptions they will tackle, because they risk working industry lobbyists into a lather.

Sen. Vincent Sheheen, D-Kershaw, said he’s optimistic those will become clear soon.

“We’ll get some resistance from the general taxes-are-bad arguments, but as long as it’s part of a larger property tax package, it may not be an issue.”

Reach Stensland at (803) 771-8358 or jstensland@thestate.com


  email this    print this    reprint or license this