Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
Search  Recent News  Archives  Web   for    

Tuesday, Nov 22, 2005
Local  XML
  email this    print this    reprint or license this   
Posted on Sun, Nov. 20, 2005

States blame S.C. for illegal cigarette trade




Knight Ridder

South Carolina offers the cheapest smokes in the nation - a fact federal officials say will make it a magnet for black market cigarette runners.

New York officials say the Palmetto State already is the source of cigarettes smuggled illegally into that state.

But S.C. officials say they see no evidence that cigarette smuggling is a problem in the Palmetto State.

In any event, they add, it's not South Carolina's problem, and they don't intend to make it tougher for the illicit trade.

Cigarette trafficking is a multimillion-dollar business that shows little sign of slowing down.

It also is attracting some of the nastiest elements of the criminal world, federal authorities say.

Lower taxes on cigarettes in Southeastern states mean bootleggers can buy them cheaper here, sell them at discounted prices in high-tax Northern states and still profit handsomely.

New York, Michigan, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Maryland are just a few of the states trying to stop truckloads of cheap cigarettes entering their borders.

However, officials of S.C. law enforcement agencies say they see no evidence the Palmetto State is the source of cigarettes smuggled elsewhere.

The bottom line:

No one inside South Carolina or elsewhere can say just how big a problem cigarette smuggling is here, but that doesn't mean federal and state officials elsewhere have no cause for escalating concern.

New York authorities say the Palmetto State is part of the pipeline of cheap smokes running up the Eastern Seaboard.

"Sure it is," said Michael Bucci, spokesman for the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance. "But it's not just South Carolina. It's also Virginia and other states in that region that have low taxes."

At 7 cents a pack, cigarette taxes in South Carolina are the lowest in the nation.

That's because North Carolina lawmakers recently raised that state's cigarette tax to 30 cents per pack - up from the previous national low of 5 cents. That state's tax will go up another 5 cents next year.

Taxes in other states and cities are far higher, making smuggling a profitable business.

For example, the sales tax alone on a pack of cigarettes in New York City is $3, compared with 7 cents in South Carolina.

Smugglers make money by buying cigarettes in South Carolina or another low-tax state and reselling them in a high-tax state for a price lower than that state's prevailing price, including its taxes.

So, the difference in cost from South Carolina to New York City - almost $30,000 for, say, 1,000 cartons - would leave plenty of room for a hefty profit, even with the cost of transporting the cigarettes.

"The lower the tax, the bigger the profit," said Earl Woodham, a spokesman for the Charlotte office of the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. "If you have organized criminals that would benefit financially from moving their operations to another state, it's only common sense that they would do that."

Officials in other states also complain that South Carolina makes it easy for smugglers. Like many other states, South Carolina stopped putting state tax stamps on cartons of cigarettes years ago.

S.C. Department of Revenue director Burnie Maybank says the tax stamps were expensive and did not benefit the state.

But the absence of an S.C. tax stamp makes it easier to resell cigarettes smuggled out of the Palmetto State in higher-tax states.

"If there's no tax stamp, its a lot easier to just affix a counterfeit," New York's Bucci said.

Maybank is unfazed.

"The purpose [of the stamps] was to make sure taxes are paid in South Carolina, not to protect higher taxes in New York state," Maybank said.

He added that evasion of S.C. taxes on cigarettes is rare.

Smuggling more than 300 cartons of cigarettes is a federal crime punishable by up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine.


  email this    print this    reprint or license this