Opinion

  Front
  AP Wire
  Lakelands News
  Sports News
  Accent
  Obituaries
  Weddings
  Archives

  Staff Directory
  Retail Rates
  Classified Rates
  Online Rates
  Subscribe

County Links

Greenwood County
Abbeville County McCormick County
Saluda County
Greenwood Chamber
McCormick Chamber
Abbeville Chamber

School Links

District 50
District 51
District 52
Abbeville
Saluda
McCormick
Cambridge Academy
Greenwood Christian
Piedmont Tech
Lander
Clemson Extension

Opinion


Numbers not surprising for black judges in state

June 13, 2005

Black candidates for judgeships in South Carolina are less like to be elected to the bench than white candidates. Also, more men are elected judges than women. Is anybody surprised? Why? You’d have to be deaf and blind not to know that without a study.
Nevertheless, it took a legislative study to find out what should be obvious, even at first glance. The study by the state Senate Judiciary Committee examined 728 judicial races since 1975. There had been 1,236 candidates involved when the study began.
There have been efforts to address the subject. And, there have been black candidates, to be sure. Still, the numbers have not significantly increased, no matter what efforts there have been.
It won’t matter how many efforts there have been or will be, the numbers aren’t likely to change appreciably unless the basic conditions are changed. To do that, of course, depends on voters.

THERE HAS BEEN GREAT progress made in getting more black South Carolinians elected to the Legislature. The members of the Legislature, of course, elect judges. More often than not they elect their own who are, certainly, in position to politick for the votes.
Black members, naturally, can politick, too, and some are elected to the bench by their peers. Still, the membership in both the House and Senate is predominantly white and male. It’s always been that way. That historically and realistically gives the advantage to white males.
They’re doing nothing wrong when they elect white males. It’s normal under those circumstances. More white males run for office and more are elected to the Legislature by the voters. Their districts are predominantly white. In predominantly black districts, voters elect black candidates to the House and Senate.

THAT’S NOT LIKELY TO change, either. Demographics dictate that. That pretty much makes it inevitable that white males will continue to hold most of the judgeships in the state ….. that is, unless the basics are changed. That isn’t likely to happen, either. So, white males will, naturally, fill more judgeships than blacks.
About the only thing that can change that, outside of redrawing political lines to create a majority of black voting districts, is a change of lawmaker attitudes, white and black. Forget color of skin or gender. Forget good ‘ol boy and racial politics. Elect the best person, based on ability and fairmindedness, not on social or other ties.
Politics and reality being what they are, though, that will be a hard sell. Still, it’s a worthy goal.



Editorial expression in this feature represents our own views.
Opinions are limited to this page.


Front | Lakelands News | Sports News | Accent | Classifieds | Obituaries
Weddings | Retail Rates | Classified Rates | Online Rates
Staff Directory | Subscribe



Government Links

Governor
S.C. General Assembly
S.C. Attorney General
S.L.E.D.
D.H.E.C.
FBI
Natural Resources
EPA
S.C. Dept. of Revenue
Dept. of Transportation
Public Safety
S.C. Election Commission
Dept. of Corrections
S.C. First Steps


©: The Index Journal. All rights reserved. Any copying, redistribution, or retransmission of any of the contents of this service without the written consent of The Index Journal is expressly prohibited. Site design and layout by SCnetSolutions.