![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Home
News
Communities
Entertainment
Classifieds
Coupons
Real estate
Jobs
Cars
Custom publications
Help
|
Business
Sports
Obituaries
Opinion
Health
Education
Features
Weddings
City People
Nation/World
Technology
Weather
Greenville
Eastside
Taylors
Westside
Greer
Mauldin
Simpsonville
Fountain Inn
Travelers Rest
Easley
Powdersville
|
![]() |
![]() |
Democrats try to reach state's voters tonightPosted Wednesday, January 28, 2004 - 8:09 pmBy DAN HOOVER STAFF WRITER dhoover@greenvillenews.com
Will it be caution or caution thrown to the winds? "The leading candidates have to not lose or say something stupid that will hurt them," said Phil Noble, chairman of the state chapter of the Democratic Leadership Council. Based on campaign themes, previous statements, demographics and analysts' assessments, candidates are almost certain to appeal to African-American voters who may provide 40 percent to 50 percent of Tuesday's turnout. They also are likely to hammer the Bush administration on massive job losses in South Carolina and tout their plans for more affordable health care, new education initiatives and higher taxes. "The candidate who makes the appeal that resonates with black voters, and at the same time is no less appealing to moderate whites, is going to be the successful one," said Bruce Ransom, a political scientist at Clemson University's Strom Thurmond Institute. If the sharp reversal of fortunes in the Jan. 19 Iowa caucuses taught them anything, the top-tier candidates won't be throwing mudballs. That may not be the case for those who have nothing more to lose after South Carolina. "Those trailing badly will try and do something to ignite a fire and try to turn things around," Noble said. "There will likely be political fireworks and someone is sure to get burned but it's hard to tell who it will be." The 90-minute nationally televised debate will air as Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry surges after victories in Iowa and New Hampshire that left his six surviving competitors seriously wounded and in need of a momentum-stopping victory somewhere, anywhere. There's a certain incongruity to national Democrats debating amid convention-like hoopla in the Republican heartland of a GOP-dominated state that their presidential nominees avoid and where the local party must often scrounge for candidates for Congress. In Greenville, the driving force in the 4th Congressional District, Democrats mount only token, if any, opposition to Republican incumbents. Republicans have elected four of the past five governors and Democrats carried the state in only one presidential election in 44 years, in 1976 with Georgia's Jimmy Carter. In New Hampshire's wake, it may be up to North Carolina Sen. John Edwards, a Seneca native who has made the state of his birth his last stand, the place where he must win. "Kerry doesn't have to win the debate, Edwards does, and clearly demonstrate he's more than just a favorite-son candidate," said Dick Harpootlian, former state Democratic Party chairman. "Edwards has to show that he's ready for prime time, that he can win," he said. "Iowa gave him a bounce; he got nothing out of New Hampshire, except maybe the realization that he's not quite there yet. If he doesn't win South Carolina (on Tuesday), he's done." The candidates With Edwards, retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark has made the ability to win in the South a hallmark of his campaign. Vermont Gov. Howard Dean was once the front-runner who lost traction in a negative campaign in Iowa and was dogged by questions in New Hampshire following his performance at a caucus night speech in Iowa. U.S. Rep. Dennis Kucinich of Ohio is the darling of the party's anti-war, far-left wing. Connecticut Sen. Joe Lieberman is the field's values-centered moderate. He has been unable to break into double digits so far amid political actuarial tables suggesting a campaign lifespan now measured in days. Al Sharpton, a New York civil rights advocate and the only remaining African-American candidate entered the campaign with no chance of winning the nomination or a state, but he has been building a following for later use as his ticket to the council table when issues are prioritized. Edwards' fourth-place finish in New Hampshire and Kerry's victory, after trailing Dean by 30 points two weeks ago, makes the South Carolina debate even more important, Harpootlian said. The fragility of Edwards' candidacy was on display Wednesday with new questions about him as a possible running mate. "No, no. Final. I don't want to be vice president. I'm running for president," he said on NBC's Today show Wednesday morning. "Kerry and Edwards, those are the only two people in the debate who matter," Harpootlian said. "The others are clutter." For Edwards, the stakes are higher in South Carolina, where he's said he must win, than in Iowa and New Hampshire, where he played the expectations game of seeking "good" showings. "Not to lose, or raise any questions, not to have any fumbles, maintain what's he accomplished here," should be his debate goals," Ransom said. 'His to lose' "In a sense, it's his to lose. He doesn't want to allow those who are supporting him or inclined to support him to start having doubts and let it come from his performance in the debate," Ransom said. "Unlike Dean, he can't get to the finish line and drop the ball." John Moylan, Edwards' state campaign chairman, said his candidate "needs to keep doing what he's been doing. When he's in front of an audience, he connects with people and he needs to connect again." Ransom said Kerry has to present himself in a way to appeal to South Carolinians. "He has to make the appeal because there are questions about whether he's writing off the state and just try to coast and concentrate" on other states. Debate performance is important, analysts said, because there is still a substantial undecided bloc of voters up for grabs. The outcome in New Hampshire was important, especially to Democrats for whom electability is the key issue, said Jack Bass of the College of Charleston. Danielle Vinson, a Furman University professor who specializes in the presidency, politics and the media, expects some of the candidates to go after Kerry and, probably, Edwards and Clark, trying to peel away support purely from regional affinity. "We'll hear a lot about job creation and what the candidates would do for military personnel and veterans," she said. "Clearly the jobs issue is on the minds of South Carolina voters, though it may not be as closely tied to trade as it would have been with (Missouri Rep. Dick) Gephardt in the race. "Kerry has to say that we continue to have discussions about who can win in the South, who can win in the West, who can win in the East, but this is one country. It's the Republicans who continue to divide us into regions," she said. Harpootlian disagreed, saying Kerry "has to take this (issue) about whether he's going to play in the South or not play in the South, whether you have to have a southerner on the ticket or not, and point out it's not what divides us that makes us a great country, but what we have in common. That's what he has to speak to and not pander to Southern sensibilities. If he does that, he'll prevail." — Dan Hoover covers politics and can be reached at 298-4883. |
![]() |
Wednesday, February 18
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
news | communities | entertainment | classifieds | real estate | jobs | cars | customer services Copyright 2003 The Greenville News. Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of Service (updated 12/17/2002). ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |