EDITORIAL
Let's Not Ruin Our
Shot at I-73 Politicians' uprising
could cost Horry County its best chance at interstate
link
Like Rip Van Winkle, all 12 Horry County Council members and
several South Strand legislators have awakened from a long nap to
discover the S.C. Department of Transportation wants to link
Interstate 73 with S.C. 22. They're unpleasantly "surprised" to
discover that the DOT last year abandoned study of an I-73 route
through southern Horry County, because of cost and environmental
concerns.
These politicians now want the agency to reopen study of a
southern route. Their motive is to quell western Horry County
concerns that farms and homes could be lost to interstate
right-of-way acquisition.
What's most frustrating about this rebellion is not so much the
belated interest that County Council members and South Strand
legislators are showing in the DOT's I-73 planning process. Why
weren't they paying closer attention as the process unfolded over
the past 2½ years?
Nor is environmental insensitivity the most frustrating aspect of
their insistence that the DOT look anew at a southern route. Running
a highway through that part of the county would entail massive
wetland destruction and place the DOT at odds with federal
regulatory agencies.
What's most frustrating is their apparent willingness to
jeopardize the project to appease their constituents. Don't council
members and South Strand legislators understand that Congress has
not yet appropriated money for this project?
Don't they understand that the politicians from other states
stand ready and eager to break South Carolina's fragile hold on a
federal I-73 appropriation and divert that money to pet projects in
other states? Don't they understand that the $1 million the S.C.
House approved for I-73 (and I-74) earlier this year, at the behest
of Rep. Tracy Edge, R-North Myrtle Beach, is not yet secured - that
other S.C. venues would love to have that money instead? All it
takes for Washington and Columbia I-73 money to disappear is the
perception that the folks whom it would benefit - us - don't really
want it.
These elected public servants should emulate S.C. Rep. Liston
Barfield, R-Aynor, the elected official at greatest risk of
political repercussions from western Horry County unhappiness at the
DOT's preferred route for the interstate. Barfield defends his
constituents' right to complain to the DOT about the route choice,
but declines to join the charge to change the route.
As a longtime legislator, Barfield understands that the agency,
in its quiet, methodical way, is processing the public input it
received from west-county residents, with an eye to minimizing
damage to farms and towns. He understands that a fight to route the
road further south could cost the county the entire project. For
this, he deserves great credit.
It's important for all who want interstate service to our
communities to stay on message on this issue - that we want, need
and deserve this highway. Having I-73 follow a route that some don't
like is far better for our communities than having no interstate at
all. |