The bill originally assumed that county councils shouldn't have the authority to stop agricultural operations, such as large-scale hog farms that have caused serious environmental problems in other states. In its expanded form, it strips councils from making local decisions on any industry that can otherwise meet state regulations.

A number of counties already have approved local laws that would restrict large-scale hog farms. And an official for a major poultry producer says that county regulations have stopped the development of large poultry houses in South Carolina. That should remain a local prerogative.

In fact, the existing regulations incorporated local choice, enabling county councils to respond to their constituents and the economic development goals for their respective counties. Confined animal operations are viewed by some local officials as deterrents to attracting high-paying economic prospects. Apparently, that view isn't shared by the state Chamber of Commerce, which endorsed the latest revision. A spokesman for the chamber said it would promote economic balance among the counties, according to The Associated Press.

The existence of local zoning recognizes the value of local authority to make land-use rules based on local circumstances. The local planning process is designed to provide for staff review, public comment, discussion by the local planning commission and its recommendation to the elected County Council.

The process is deliberate, and is designed to safeguard the public interest. This proposal, in contrast, was written with special interests in mind. It is surprising that legislators would have the temerity to seek its approval.