GoUpstate.com

This is a printer friendly version of an article from www.goupstate.com
To print this article open the file menu and choose Print.

Back
Article published Oct 14, 2004
Sanford visits SRMC to pitch tort reform

ROBERT W. DALTON
Staff Writer


Gov. Mark Sanford said Wednesday that he wants juries in civil cases to be able to decide whether accident victims who fail to wear seat belts play a role in their injury.One day after unveiling his "Contract for Change" -- his agenda for the next legislative session -- Sanford visited Spartanburg Regional Medical Center to detail the tort reform aspect of his plan. His agenda also includes income tax relief, government restructuring, educational choice and updating Senate rules.A host of state and local officials joined Sanford at Tuesday's news conference, as did several SRMC physicians and staff members.Sanford said he has stayed out of the tort reform battle in the Legislature for the past two years. But he said he has taken notice as more than 20 states enacted reforms over the past three years."If we're going to attract jobs and be competitive, we have to keep up with what other states are doing," Sanford said.The U.S. Chamber Institute ranks South Carolina's tort liability system the ninth worst in the nation. That spells trouble for small businesses as well as the medical community, Sanford said.Sanford said medical malpractice premiums for OB-GYNs jumped from about $10,000 in 1999 to more than $47,000 in 2004."That impacts accessibility and it impactscost," Sanford said.He said it also forces physicians to practice defensive medicine while keeping an eye on the legal system.Sanford's tort reform proposal would:• Cap non-economic damages at $300,000.• Cap punitive damages at three times actual damages.• Create "fair share" liability, making each defendant liable only for the damages caused.• Eliminate venue shopping by limiting the venue of a case to where an accident occurred, the home of the defendant or the home of the plaintiff.• Allow evidence of a plaintiff's failure to wear a seat belt into trial to show contributory negligence.Sanford said that allowing seat-belt evidence would be a greater incentive for people to buckle up than would making failure to wear a seat belt a primary offense."What's going to impact behavior more significantly, a $25 fine or the possibility of being held liable in an auto accident and losing hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees?" he said.Charles Townson, SRMC's chief operating officer, said the proposal would provide much needed relief for the medical community. He said conditions had worsened over the years and some communities are without doctors because they couldn't afford to stay.State House Speaker Pro Tem Doug Smith, R-Spartanburg, who sponsored a medical malpractice overhaul last session, said Sanford's proposal would be a "slam dunk" in the House."It's vitally important," Smith said. "There's not a day that goes by that a doctor doesn't ask me when we're going to get this passed."State Sen. Glenn Reese, D-Boiling Springs, said he also is on board."I think the time has come, and (tort reform) is going to happen on the state level and nationally," Reese said. "I think the legal community understands that and will get involved.State Sen. John Hawkins, R-Spartanburg, an attorney who recently filed a class-action lawsuit against SRMC saying it charged uninsured patients more than it charged those with insurance, didn't attend the news conference. Hawkins said he received late notice and was unable to change his schedule.Hawkins said he would favor a compromise that is fair to lawyers, doctors, business owners and plaintiffs."The one thing I don't want is to be part of something that's drastic or would work undue injustice on a large number of people," he said. "But if we can get everyone to the table and come up with something that is fair, I would support that."Robert W. Dalton can be reached at 562-7274 or bob.dalton@shj.com.