printer friendly format sponsored by:
The New Media Department of The Post and Courier

MONDAY, APRIL 18, 2005 12:00 AM

Failed public accountability test

As highway commissioners ponder the need for an independent review of the Department of Transportation, they should consider improving their own accountability in the open meeting process. At the commission's last meeting, it fell below the standard set by the state's Freedom of Information Act.

The board reportedly met in an unannounced meeting behind closed doors between regularly scheduled meetings last month. The Greenville News reported that the meeting included a majority of the board, though not Commission Chairman Tee Hooper.

Commissioner Marion Carnell said the meeting wasn't improper because it wasn't official. "We were just sitting around shooting the bull," he told the News. "We weren't taking up new business."

Mr. Carnell is a former long-time legislator. He and many of his fellow commissioners have been around government long enough to be aware that meeting with a board quorum automatically qualifies as an official meeting under state law. It strains credulity to think that board members actually believe they can meet "informally" under any circumstances.

According to the News, the board discussed minor matters in their "informal" session, including renaming the Earle Morris Highway in Pickens County. But in the absence of public scrutiny intended by the open meetings provisions of the FOIA, who can be sure?

The board clearly recognizes that the criticism by Chairman Tee Hooper of agency operations related to Executive Director Elizabeth S. Mabry has created a potential crisis of confidence for the agency. That was demonstrated by the commission's decision to hire a consultant to conduct an independent review of the agency, and by the commission's endorsement of Mrs. Mabry's work at DOT. (As chairman, Mr. Hooper didn't vote.)

The commission's efforts for damage control are diminished, however, when the commission itself fails to meet the standards established for public bodies meeting to conduct the public's business and spend the public's money. If commissioners don't recognize what constitutes a public meeting, that is real cause for public concern.


This article was printed via the web on 4/20/2005 4:12:03 PM . This article
appeared in The Post and Courier and updated online at Charleston.net on Monday, April 18, 2005.