Senate preserves
nuclear waste move to SRS in bill
By LAUREN
MARKOE Washington
Bureau
WASHINGTON — As the Senate tries to wrap up its defense
budget bill for 2005, U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.,
protected a fragile nuclear victory he savored earlier this
month.
Then, it had been won by the closest of votes. Graham had
successfully added language to a bill that would allow the storage
of high-level nuclear waste at the Savannah River Site near Aiken —
storage that is now prohibited by federal law.
But U.S. Sens. Fritz Hollings, D-S.C., and Maria
Cantwell, D-Wash., called the move a dangerous precedent and
asked the Senate to strike Graham’s language.
The Senate refused on June 3: 48-48.
Cantwell knew that several senators sympathetic to her efforts
had not been in Washington when the vote was taken.
She could try again when they returned. Recently, she thought she
had the votes.
But Graham, who says on-site storage is safe and cheaper than
hauling it to a federal repository, can count noses as well as
Cant-well.
He talked to U.S. Sen. Gordon Smith, R-Ore. Would Smith,
who voted with Cantwell last time, vote against her if he had extra
assurances that high-level nuclear waste would not remain in
Oregon?
Smith, according to sources on both sides of the question, said
he would and received the extra guarantee he needed.
Cantwell saw she could not win on the Senate floor and did not
try.
Graham’s language still must be approved by a House-Senate
conference committee.
AND THE KITCHEN SINK
Some — including Cantwell — have argued that it would have been
more appropriate for Graham to resolve the nuclear waste storage
issue in an energy bill, rather than in the defense budget bill.
But nuclear waste seems to fit into the military budget a bit
better than protecting children from violent television shows.
Yet Hollings gleefully announced last week that a measure he had
been trying to enact into law for a decade — to protect children
from violent TV — finally made it into a major piece of
legislation.
You guessed it — that same defense authorization bill.
The measure would require the Federal Communications Commission
to study whether the “V-chip” technology that helps parents screen
out potentially harmful programming works adequately when it comes
to violent television.
The FCC also would have to determine whether the system that
rates shows for violent content is doing its job. If not, the agency
would have to prohibit violent shows during the hours children watch
most.
To safeguard children, highly sexual programs may not run during
certain hours, but the same does not hold for violent shows.
Hollings points to studies that link violent behavior in children to
their exposure to violent programming.
Like the nuclear storage issue, this measure will be retained or
thrown out of the defense authorization bill in a House-Senate
conference committee, which is expected to meet within the next few
weeks.
To become law, the defense bill must be approved by both the
House and Senate and signed by President Bush.
Heard on the Hill
“We have made mistakes. We have underestimated how many people we
need on the ground. We have made it difficult at times to get
international cooperation. But that’s in the past. It is now time
for NATO to help where NATO can.”
— U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., speaking from Iraq on
“This Week With George Stephanopoulos”
Reach Markoe at (202) 383-6023 or lmarkoe@krwashington.com. |