x-sender: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com
x-receiver: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com
Received: from mail pickup service by IQ12 with Microsoft SMTPSVC;
	 Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:02:52 -0500
thread-index: AdBXdvsfT8IdWJmkRH22e2DTv486Zg==
Thread-Topic: Berkeley County DSS
From: <governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com>
To: <governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com>
Subject: Berkeley County DSS
Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2015 14:02:52 -0500
Message-ID: <890CDB57ECBD4F87B3AA6B3F2A89C231@IQ12>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 05 Mar 2015 19:02:52.0640 (UTC) FILETIME=[FB3A3E00:01D05776]

<APP>CUSTOM
<PREFIX>Mrs.</PREFIX>
<FIRST>Tammy</FIRST>
<MIDDLE>C</MIDDLE>
<LAST>Davis</LAST>
<SUFFIX></SUFFIX>
<TITLE>Concern Regarding DSS</TITLE>
<ORGANIZATION></ORGANIZATION>
<ADDR1>140 Dorothy Drive</ADDR1>
<ADDR2></ADDR2>
<CITY>Charleston</CITY>
<STATE>SC</STATE>
<ZIP>29414</ZIP>
<EMAIL>tamcdavis@yahoo.com</EMAIL>
<PHONE_H>843-810-0456</PHONE_H>
<PHONE_B></PHONE_B>
<ISSUE>SCHED</ISSUE>
<SUBJECT>Berkeley County DSS</SUBJECT>
<MSG>
I and several others have grave concerns about Berkeley County DSS (specific caseworkers).  We have spoken with everyone we know to contact, including Laura Mills w/DSS in Columbia, and have found they CANNOT be trusted. We feel they are aiding and abetting unfit parents (tipping them off) in a particular situation in which we have had been involved.  The "parents" supposedly are not to be with these 2 babies (nearly 3 yrs old and nearly 2 yrs old) unsupervised.  That is not being followed - in fact, after months of not having them because of this, the babies have been returned to her w/NO ramifications.  The babies tested positive by hair follicle for marijuana on or about June, 2014. These babies have been moved 6 times in 9 months because "mom" had a meltdown and can still call the shots; the caseworker does as she commands.  Today, it appears she was tipped off again so she wouldn't be caught w/the babies unsupervised(too lengthy to explain).  When we called one of the local supervisors, we were told they don't file a Complaint w/the Courts "just for positive drug tests".  If not that, what WILL they do to help these and other babies like them?!  Many studies show that it is highly unlikely that a non-smoker of marijuana will test positive from second-hand smoke.  WHY AREN'T THESE BABIES BEING PROTECTED?!  PLEASE HELP!!
</MSG>

</APP>