Upstate GOP voters
not excited about candidates Enthusiasm for Gov. Sanford low — even lower for his
primary opponent By LEE
BANDY lbandy@thestate.com
GREER — Hard by the Greenville-Spartanburg county line,
Greer sits smack dab in the hotbed of the Republican Upstate.
Surrounded by growing shopping complexes and subdivisions, its
residents regularly pad the GOP’s margins in statewide
elections.
That may happen again this fall, but voters in this conservative
center appear clearly ambivalent about the June 13 Republican
primary election.
Though many residents are passionately against illegal immigrants
living in this country, they are lukewarm at best about Republican
Gov. Mark Sanford. And they know little, if anything, about his GOP
primary rival, Prosperity physician Oscar Lovelace.
While that could translate to bad news at the polls for Sanford,
Lovelace has little in his campaign coffers to break any message
through.
“I’m usually very active politically, but not this time,” says
Christine DeGraaf, a 31-year-old pet store owner who cut her teeth
on politics in Vermont. “My business consumes most of my time right
now.”
But she will vote.
“By the time the election rolls around, I will have educated
myself on the candidates and I will vote,” she vows.
DeGraaf, who calls herself a conservative, is not alone. Many
voters here have yet to tune in to the primary election. For now,
politics doesn’t interest them.
They’re not in the mood. They’re preoccupied with family and
school — and bothered by the war in Iraq.
“Bush has gotten us into a lot of trouble over there; I don’t
know how we’re going to get out,” says Diane Spivey, a 61-year-old
clerk at a children’s boutique.
“This could be President Bush’s downfall.”
Despite her concerns, she remains a strong supporter of the
president.
NO CARTWHEELS
This still is Bush Country, although cracks are beginning to show
in what once was solid support for the president in South
Carolina.
Chuck Gladfelter, a 68-year-old transplant from Detroit, Mich.,
and owner of a picture frame shop here, voted for Bush but is not
sure he would do it again.
“I don’t like the way he handles things,” he says. “I don’t like
his management style. I think he’s his own worst enemy.”
The mention of Sanford, who is wrapping up his first term as
governor and going for a second, doesn’t excite voters, either. Most
yawn or give a blank stare when asked to identify Sanford’s
accomplishments.
But that won’t keep them from voting for him — if they turn out.
Many say they will hold their noses and cast a ballot for Sanford,
anyway, because there’s no one else.
Ever hear of Oscar Lovelace?
“I’ve heard of Linda Lovelace,” quipped Barney Sullivan, a
64-year-old liquor store owner, recalling the 1970s porn star.
Sullivan was among a handful of strong Sanford supporters among
the two dozen voters interviewed for this story. Almost all of those
interviewed identified themselves as Republicans or conservatives.
Democrats were difficult to find.
“He has done a good job,” Sullivan says of the governor.
Sullivan saved his ire for the Legislature, blaming the
Republican-controlled body for the state’s ills.
“They couldn’t draw a straight line with a ruler,” he says. “If I
were the governor, I’d put them on sabbatical. They don’t know what
they’re doing.”
Most of the voters interviewed knew Oscar Lovelace’s name. They
have seen his signs along the highways and byways, but they know
nothing about the man.
“I’ve heard his name, but that’s about it,” says Nancy Dykes, a
55-year-old store manager. “I know nothing about the man.”
“Never heard of him,” says Reese Davis, 53-year-old owner of a
scuba diving store.
Most voters thought Sanford would win the primary because he has
the most money — more than $5 million on hand on March 31. In
contrast, Lovelace had $87,166 on hand.
Beyond that advantage, voters — even those who supported Sanford
in 2002 — tended to give him low marks for his performance after
three years.
“He’s not an inspiring type of guy,” says Francis Marion
University political scientist Neal Thigpen, a Republican activist.
“His ace in the hole is all that money.”
Currently, 51 percent of state voters view Sanford’s job
performance positively while 43 percent have a negative view,
according to a Survey USA poll taken of 600 adults April 7-9. The
survey has a margin of error of plus or minus 4.1 percent.
“I’m not too impressed with him,” says Catherine Bettencourt, a
49-year-old sales associate.
Asked what sticks out in her mind most about the governor, she
replies, “The pigs. The day he brought them to the Legislature. That
was stupid. But he has made a lot of mistakes. He has gotten a lot
of people mad at him.”
Issues that concern Upstate voters are no different than
elsewhere in South Carolina.
Aside from the war, their chief concern is immigration and
whether amnesty should be granted to the estimated 11 million people
residing illegally in this country.
“No amnesty,” shouts Robert Johnson, a retired technical
writer.
His wife, Pat, a retired executive assistant, is just as zealous
about whether we should secure our borders.
“Absolutely,” she says.
Even if it might mean building a barrier like the Great Wall of
China to close our Southern border?
“That’s about what it’s going to take,” she says.
|