Tools can help ease
property tax burden
By HOWARD
DUVALL Guest
columnist
Property taxes have long been the whipping post of those who like
to rail against local government.
For years, property taxes were the only own-source revenue for
funding local government in South Carolina. Since the passage of the
Home Rule Act in 1975 after a constitutional amendment approved by
the voters, county and municipal governments have had more options
for funding police, fire and other needed services. This has allowed
municipal government to decrease its dependency on the property
tax.
Municipal government long ago realized that the same property
taxpayer cannot adequately fund cities, counties and schools. We who
support local governments have pushed for more diverse funding
sources, and the Legislature has approved several options.
The local option sales tax, passed in 1990 and adopted in
Charleston County that same year, has allowed the municipalities in
the 29 counties that have adopted local option to reduce property
taxes, and in some cases eliminate them completely. Since 1990, more
than $600 million in local option money has provided property tax
relief to the citizens of Charleston County. A substantial portion
of local option dollars are collected from tourists visiting
Charleston County.
The citizens of Richland County adopted the local option sales
tax in November 2004. The property tax bills being sent to Richland
County property taxpayers this year will be reduced by $52 million
collected through the sales tax. This will go a long way to ease the
impact of the property tax reassessment, which will also be
reflected in the tax bills.
Other taxes such as the local hospitality tax, local
accommodations tax, development impact fees and business license
taxes allow municipal government options to reduce the burden on the
property taxpayer. From 1990 to 2000, municipal government decreased
the dependency on the property tax as a percentage of own-source
revenue from 45.4 percent to 32.8 percent. This decrease shows that
municipal elected officials heard their residents’ frustration with
property taxes and responded. With additional tools from the
Legislature, we will reduce the burden even more.
This year the General Assembly will be studying the property tax
system. This study will not be the first on property taxes. A study
done for Gov. Carroll Campbell concluded, “We do not have a property
tax problem, we have a school funding problem.” Since then, the
problem of funding our children’s education has grown into a crisis.
School funding, which is a state government responsibility, should
be the focus of the legislative study committees.
The Annual Municipal Financial Report of the state Budget and
Control Board for 2000 shows that statewide, 59.9 percent of
property tax revenues go to school districts. This compares to 27.4
percent for county governments, 8.7 percent for municipalities, and
4 percent for special-purpose districts.
Municipal government looks forward to working in partnership with
the legislative study committees to find solutions that reduce the
property tax burden on homeowners and address our school funding
crisis. We can show that a diversified menu of tax sources allows
local elected officials the flexibility to choose how to fund
necessary services. We can show that the local option sales tax
works to reduce the burden on property taxpayers. We can show that,
working together, we can solve any problem facing our state.
Some suggestions for the study committees:
• Adequately fund public education
with state tax resources.
• Allow school districts to
participate in development impact fees.
• Change school funding formulas
that force unnecessary property tax increases.
• Provide for income-related
circuit-breakers to protect those with low income levels from
property taxes.
• Provide income-related
circuit-breakers for the existing homestead exemptions.
• Allow the local option sales tax
to be enacted by ordinance of the county council if 100 percent of
the revenue is devoted to property tax relief.
• Remove restrictions on the uses
of local accommodations and hospitality taxes and allow local
elected officials to decide how to best use these sources of
revenue.
Mr. Duvall is executive director of the state Municipal
Association. |