Crack down on cockfighting

(Published May 22‚ 2005)

Yes, we are aware that some critics have disparaged tougher penalties for cockfighting because, they say, lawmakers made the bill a higher priority than a domestic violence bill. But it's still important to lower the boom on cockfighting.

Other than political symbolism, the cockfighting bill bears little relation to the criminal domestic violence bill -- except perhaps that both would help address serious problems in this state. Under a bill given key approval in the House last week, people involved in cockfighting would face bigger fines or longer jail time.

For more than a century in South Carolina, this underground activity has been a misdemeanor. The only punishment faced by its practitioners has been a $100 fine or up to 30 days in jail, hardly a deterrent.

Under the House bill, a first offense, still a misdemeanor, would carry a fine of $1,000 or up to a year in jail. Fines for a second offense would rise to $3,000, with a possible jail sentence of up to three years. A third offense of participating in an event where two gamefowl fight would be a felony punishable by up to five years in prison.

This is not a sport, at least not one condoned by most societies. It has little to do with the traditional aspects of sport. It has a lot to do with illicit gambling. Without the allure of betting on the birds, cockfighting would disappear.

Cockfighting is banned in every state except Louisiana and New Mexico. It is a felony in 31 states and a misdemeanor in 17.

It is appropriate that South Carolina join the majority of states in taking this bloodthirsty endeavor more seriously.

IN SUMMARY

In House bill, a third offense for cockfighting now would be a felony with stiffer fines and jail time.

Copyright © 2005 The Herald, Rock Hill, South Carolina