These candidates
have one critical thing in common: independence
by BRAD
WARTHEN Editorial Page
Editor
OUR LEGISLATIVE endorsements in Tuesday’s primary runoffs are
based upon a theme that should by now be quite familiar to our
readers: independence.
We want lawmakers who will think for themselves, rather than
letting outside forces dictate to them. We want legislators who,
when it comes to deciding state policy, feel beholden to no one but
their constituents.
By “outside forces,” I mean political parties as well as
out-of-state groups who try to stack our Legislature with people who
will support their agendas.
We saw an illustration of that last week, with the revelation
that the misleadingly named “All Children Matter” is backing Joan
Brady against Susan Brill for the Republican nomination in House
District 78. All Children Matter is a Michigan group dedicated to
pushing “school choice,” which it defines as including such things
as giving people tax breaks to abandon public schools.
The organization’s Web site puts it in much more innocuous
language than that, of course. You have to read carefully to figure
out the agenda. But at least you can figure it out from the site,
which is more than one can say for the ads supporting Ms. Brady.
Neither the radio ads nor the mailing supporting her reveals the
group’s agenda. Instead, they back her for signing away her right to
think independently to yet another out-of-state group, Americans for
Tax Reform. She did that by being one of the few candidates we spoke
with this year to sign ATR’s infamous no-new-taxes pledge.
Ms. Brady, for her part, declines to embrace publicly the
Michigan group’s agenda. That sounds good, except for two things:
First, it reminds me that she also declined to say in her interview
with us whether she would sign the tax pledge, which she later did.
Second, All Children Matter has enough confidence that she’s on
their side to bet their money on her. Of course, that could be
because opponent Susan Brill is definitely not in their corner. As
she told The State last week, “I’m standing with the folks in our
school district who say this is not good for us” — as opposed to
manipulative outsiders who say that it is.
Her clear independence of such influences is the main reason
we’re supporting Ms. Brill over Ms. Brady on Tuesday.
There are other ways to be independent that matter just as much.
For instance, we are backing Nikki Haley in her bid to unseat Rep.
Larry Koon in District 87 because she promises to inject fresh blood
into the House, rather than being yet another reliable vote for the
existing House leadership.
At 30 years and counting, Mr. Koon is the longest-serving
Republican in the House. He is also one of the most reliable votes
for House Speaker David Wilkins — so reliable, in fact, that when
Mr. Koon let it be known he was planning to retire, the speaker
stepped in to talk him out of it.
In a letter addressed “To the voters of Lexington County,” Mr.
Wilkins acknowledged that “after three decades of public service,
Larry has earned some well-deserved rest. But earlier this year, I
asked Larry to reconsider his decision because quite frankly, we
need him now more than ever.”
And why is this, as the speaker wrote, “a matter of great
importance, both to Lexington County and the State of South
Carolina”? The speaker asked the voters to consider three facts:
that Mr. Koon is “the senior ranking Republican in the House” that
he led the drive for a property tax cut nine years ago; and that he
is an experienced and respected member of the Ways and Means
Committee. That was pretty much it in terms of reasoning.
Mr. Wilkins then went on to ask, “Will you help make sure Larry
Koon returns for another term to help solve our state’s budget
crisis?”
The letter gave no indication as to what sort of rabbit Mr. Koon
would pull out of his hat to accomplish that. Nor did it explain why
he hadn’t pulled it out before now.
By contrast, Ms. Haley would like to see lawmakers take a whole
new approach to the budget. She comes at it from the perspective of
a businesswoman. (Her family owns an upscale clothing store in
Lexington County.)
Actually, I’m understating that. At one point during her
endorsement interview, I scribbled the following in my notes:
“mentions ‘in a business’ for about the 14th time.” As in, “In a
business... every day you go in with an open mind.”
That means you don’t do things the way they’ve always been done.
“You start solving problems before they happen,” she said. You also
stop the time-honored legislative practice of starting “spending on
programs without any idea where the money is coming from down the
line.”
It also means that you think for yourself, rather than letting
party chiefs or out-of-state advocacy groups get between you and
your constituents. “You need to talk to the people, you need to
research it, you need to debate it, and then you need to go back and
talk to the people,” she said. “That’s what I see missing.”
So she signs no pledges. “No one wants to see taxes raised, but
that would be closed-minded.” She is so tax-averse she wouldn’t even
raise the cigarette tax without reforming Medicaid first. But she
understands, as a businesswoman, that you don’t close your options
before you begin.
Speaker Wilkins told me Friday that his letter in favor of Mr.
Koon was nothing unusual, but something he does for any GOP caucus
member who asks. “I’m very loyal to my House caucus members.” He
says that if one of those members is unseated by another Republican,
then his loyalty will transfer to the winner. “That is my philosophy
— if you’re a part of the family, if you’re a part of the team, I’m
loyal to you.” He says he told that to Nathan Ballentine after he
unseated the speaker’s own majority leader, Rick Quinn.
Presumably, he would be saying the same to Nikki Haley if she
wins on Tuesday.
But while it may be all the same either way to the speaker,
there’s a big difference here for the voters of District 87: If they
like the direction in which the Legislature has taken South Carolina
over the past 30 years, they should vote for Larry Koon. If they
think we need a change, they should back Nikki Haley.
Write to Mr. Warthen at P.O. Box 1333, Columbia, S.C. 29202, or
bwarthen@thestate.com. |