As the General Assembly enters its final weeks of this year's
term, Gov. Mark Sanford called on lawmakers to focus on his
proposals to reform education funding, restructure state government
and cut income taxes while increasing the state's cigarette tax.
Since taking office in January, Sanford has pushed income tax
relief as key to renewed economic prosperity in the state.
Sanford said his proposal to cut income taxes, coupled with a
53-cent-a-pack increase on cigarettes, would put more money into the
pockets of small-business owners and individual income earners. It
also would attract more business and industry to South Carolina,
thereby growing the economy, he said.
The extra revenue from cigarette taxes also benefits underfunded
Medicaid programs and provides millions of dollars in federal
matching funds, Sanford said
If Medicaid is not funded, underprivileged people will turn to
more expensive care at emergency rooms -- which comes out of the
pockets of taxpayers.
The proposal, which was introduced March 13, had been part of the
state's $5.2 billion budget approved by the Senate Finance
Committee. But Tuesday, it was ruled out of order during Senate
budget debate and was sent to a Senate Medical Affairs
subcommittee.
Sanford also wants reform in how education is funded. A bill
called Streamlined Management and Accountable Resources for
Teaching, or SMART Funding, would give school districts flexibility
to spend funds as they see fit.
The bill, introduced March 26 and currently in a House committee,
would consolidate dozens of spending sources into six
categories.
Sanford also called on lawmakers to work on his proposal to
restructure state government.
Under the South Carolina Government Restructuring Act that was
introduced April 16, the governor would appoint some statewide
officers who are now elected and the governor and lieutenant
governor would run on the same ticket.
The final day of the Legislature is June 5. Any legislation not
completed by then can be revived next year, as the General Assembly
is in the first year of a two-year session.
School Size Limits Compromise Explored
Legislation suggesting enrollment guidelines for new schools and
encouraging the conversion of existing buildings into schools
received an endorsement Wednesday from a House subcommittee.
A week after rejecting Gov. Mark Sanford's call for limiting the
size of student bodies in all public schools, a subcommittee that
screens education bills backed less proscriptive language for future
construction.
Lawmakers would have to take extraordinary steps for the measure
to move to the top of their agenda before the legislative session
ends June 5.
Nevertheless, the House K-12 panel voted unanimously for a bill
that advises school districts to design buildings with capacities of
"approximately" 700 students at the elementary level, 900 students
at the middle school level and 1,200 students at the high school
level.
Sanford suggested legislators set enrollment caps of 500 students
for elementary schools, 700 students for middle schools and 900
students for high schools.
Given the state's budget crisis, Rep. Bob Walker, R-Spartanburg,
characterized the version he and four House colleagues backed as a
"workable compromise" between educators, legislators and the
governor.
Chip Campsen, a gubernatorial aide who monitored the subcommittee
meeting, said, "we would have rather had the lower numbers."
Campsen noted two other provisions are viewed by Sanford as
reform-minded. The bill says minimum acreage requirements no longer
are necessary. It also gives the state Education Department
authority to grant waivers of some school building rules that would
encourage use of vacant structures.
Campsen described Sanford's interest in smaller schools as a way
of stemming "suburban sprawl. He believes there should be smaller
schools. There's an emphasis on education and a quality of life
component to this."
As an incentive to convert vacant buildings into schools, the
bill would allow local jurisdictions to collect fees in lieu of
taxes as an incentive to keep privately owned property on tax
rolls.
The proposed law also says school districts can own vacant land
for no more than six years before they must use it or sell the
property at public
auction.