x-sender: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com x-receiver: governor.haley@sc.lmhostediq.com Received: from mail pickup service by sc.lmhostediq.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:46:59 -0400 thread-index: AdGQ5Li4cMr5GayYRPK0CJ3H+hmckg== Thread-Topic: cpntraband cellphones From: To: Subject: cpntraband cellphones Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 11:46:59 -0400 Message-ID: <83732F470D654BCBA5F4450FBDF8E61E@IQ12> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message Importance: normal Priority: normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.1.7601.17609 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 07 Apr 2016 15:46:59.0819 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8D253B0:01D190E4] CUSTOM (703) 598-1800 Howard Buskirk Howard Buskirk Communications Daily 8128 Mississippi Rd Laurel MD 20724 hbuskirk@warren-news.com (703) 598-1800 (703) 598-1800 PRESS cpntraband cellphones 69.251.201.7 I'm wondering what's next on contraband cellphones. My sense is that FCC Chairman Wheeler understands this is an issue but it has sort of been pushed to the side a bit with everything else that has been going on. But yesterday's event made clear this is a huge issue in the states, which would seem to put some pressure on the FCC to at least address the earlier NPRM. On the other hand, the public safety speakers seemed to want to be able to jam cell signals in prisons and I'm not sure that's something the FCC could embrace.