COLUMBIA - With Hilton Head Island and
Myrtle Beach at the end of rivers that nearly dried up during last
year's drought, South Carolina can't afford to reach that precipice
again.
The state needs to negotiate an agreement with Georgia on the use
of Savannah River water, demand protection in federal relicensing of
dams on upstream lakes in North Carolina and consider tighter
regulation of its own water, a group of experts decided Tuesday.
The Water Law Review Committee, appointed by Gov. Mark Sanford,
suggested several major changes in how the state deals with water
issues. The final draft of the report will be completed in January.
Then it's up to Sanford and state legislators to act on the
suggestions.
Committee Chairman Steve Spitz noted the need for the governor
and the General Assembly to take action soon. Officials in the
fast-growing Atlanta area already have begun talking about importing
water from the Savannah. The relicensing process already has begun
for some N.C. dams. And the four-year drought that ended last year
showed the state's water supply isn't unlimited.
The committee suggested Sanford begin work on a formal compact
with Georgia and the federal government, which through the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers manages lakes Thurmond, Russell and Hartwell on
the Savannah.
"We need to take the initiative to make that happen, because if
we don't take the initiative, it's not going to happen," said Dean
Moss, general manager of the Beaufort-Jasper Water and Sewer
Authority.
The compact could address such issues as how much water either
state could pipe to communities or industries and how much pollution
could be released into the river. A major concern is whether
utilities would be allowed to sell the Savannah River water to other
areas, such as Atlanta.
"We share 300 miles of river that's a state line," Moss said.
"The opportunity for conflict exists on every one of those
miles."
While the committee left open the possibility of a compact with
North Carolina regarding the Yadkin-Pee Dee and Catawba river
basins, the focus in that area will be the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission's relicensing of dams on those rivers in North
Carolina.
"It's critically important for the state of South Carolina to use
all of its agencies and all of its regulatory powers" to convince
the federal agency to ensure a sufficient flow of water from those
dams, Spitz said.
During the recent drought, N.C. officials agreed to release
enough water from the dams to prevent salt water from the Atlantic
from entering Myrtle Beach's water supply. S.C. officials want those
sorts of emergency release requirements built into new licenses
approved over the next few years.
To help make the case for cooperation in North Carolina and
Georgia, the committee recommended making S.C. regulations more
compatible with our neighbors' rules.
Currently, the state has few regulations on how much water a
utility or industry can withdraw from a river or lake unless drought
restrictions are in place.
Georgia and North Carolina have withdrawal permit
systems.