Gov. Mark Sanford's income-tax
proposal got roughed up in Senate committees over the past week for
good reason. South Carolina cannot afford it, and it has been touted
based on bogus assumptions.
Sanford wants to reduce the top state income tax rate from 7
percent to 4.8 percent over 10 years -- a move that would cost the
state $1 billion. South Carolina already is behind in paying for
schools, roads, bridges, mental health care, environmental
protection, public safety officers, prisons and higher education. It
cannot afford to slash its revenue, especially in light of the
demands of growth and the flimsiness of the argument to make the
cuts.
Sanford says South Carolina
could be more competitive if it had a lower income tax rate. He says
Florida attracts more wealthy people and the industries and jobs
they bring with them because it has no state income tax. But even
with its current income tax rates, South Carolina's overall tax
burden is among America's lowest.
Recent research by the state Board of Economic Advisors shows
that the tax burden in Florida is higher than South Carolina in many
other ways, including cigarette tax, a tax on local phone calls, a
tax on home satellite television service, a tax on outpatient
hospital services and drastically higher property taxes.
Beaufort County has for decades attracted some of the brightest,
most successful retirees in America. Many of them come because of
the low taxes. Few of them have spawned new industries that create
local jobs, though they have spawned a sprawling service industry
with many low-end jobs.
And while the retirees bring many assets to the community --
including immeasurable contributions to civic and social life --
they also bring new demands for expensive government services. Roads
and bridges are a prime example, along with a need for more police,
schools, health care, judicial services, parks and recreation, etc.
The Senate has a better plan. It addresses the legitimate problem
brought forward by the governor without breaking the bank. A plan
approved by the Finance Committee would put small businesses on a
level playing field when paying corporate taxes. It cuts the top
rate small business owners pay from 7 percent to 5 percent, which is
the same rate corporations pay on their profits. That inequity needs
to be fixed, especially since small business is the backbone of the
local and state economies.
That move will cost about $129 million yearly when fully
implemented in four years. The state can afford that, and it will do
what the governor wants -- encourage and reward
entrepreneurship.