House split on
tuition credit bill ‘Full debate’
predicted as some vow to kill plan while others seek to resurrect
it By JENNIFER
TALHELM Staff
Writer
A day after Gov. Mark Sanford’s tuition tax credit plan passed a
House committee in a much scaled-back form, lawmakers are vowing to
kill the bill or resurrect it.
Whichever happens, there’s bound to be a tense fight on the House
floor about the direction of the plan that would give parents tax
breaks to send their children to private school.
Many say they’re glad to get it to the full House. Members of the
Ways and Means Committee had been under intense pressure.
Supporters had advertised against lawmakers and threatened to
campaign against Republicans who voted against the bill.
“It’s positive that we’ll have a full debate on it,” said House
Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville.
Lawmakers came within one vote of killing the measure during a
committee meeting Monday.
The original bill, dubbed “Put Parents in Charge,” would have
allowed parents statewide to take a tax credit for home-school
expenses or to send their children to private school or another
public school.
Instead, the House Ways and Means Committee agreed to a
compromise that would allow the Education Department to set up a
pilot program in two districts — one rich and one poor.
Another amendment limits tax-deductible donations for
scholarships to $10,000.
Lawmakers remain bitterly divided over what to do now.
“It’s super they provided a vehicle for debate on the floor,”
said Majority Leader Jim Merrill, R-Charleston, a supporter of the
original bill. “The (pilot) proposal was garbage.”
Others say any version of tax credits would be a move in the
wrong direction.
“If all this energy were being spent on our current public
schools, they wouldn’t be in the condition they’re in now,” said
Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Richland.
Many said it would be difficult for some lawmakers — particularly
Republicans — to vote against the bill now.
Many Republicans had criticized the original bill for being too
sweeping and untested. They feared it would drain too much money
from the state’s $5.8 billion budget. The amendments, for some,
alleviated both concerns.
“I will probably vote for the version that Ways and Means
passed,” said Rep. Michael Thompson, R-Anderson, who had opposed the
bill because of its impact on the budget.
But others, unhappy with the watered-down version, vowed to
restore the bill to something closer to the original.
Many want to set up a voucher program for low-income students and
a tax credit for wealthier families whose children attend failing
schools. An amendment that would do that failed in a tie vote
Monday.
The current bill “doesn’t put anybody in charge except the
Department of Education,” said Rep. Lewis Vaughn, R-Greenville, a
longtime tax credit backer.
Bill supporters say the voucher and tax credit would give more
parents a chance to put their children in better schools. That was
the point of Sanford’s bill, they said.
“We’ll make every effort to get the bill back to its original
form,” said Rep. Tracy Edge, R-Horry.
Sanford spokesman Will Folks said any expansion would be better
than what passed the committee.
“Hopefully, we would get back to where we were to begin with,” he
said, “which is a plan that materially expanded parents’ right to
choose in South Carolina.”
Reach Talhelm at (803) 771-8339 or jtalhelm@thestate.com |