COLUMBIA - Gov. Mark Sanford vetoed a bill Thursday that would limit fines on
some ethics law violations to no more than $5,000, using the opportunity to give
the Legislature a lecture on conducting its business in the open.
The State Ethics Commission had asked for the cap because a 2003 law change
sent fines soaring. Before, the fines were capped at $500, but the 2003 law
eliminated the cap, allowing fines to grow daily.
Legislators had hoped that open-ended fines would encourage compliance with
the law, but it led to unintended, large fines the commission said it had no
hopes of ever collecting.
Through April, the commission reported more than $1.2 million in unpaid
penalties for paperwork violations. For instance, Greenville City Council
candidate William C. Mitchell owes $242,900, North Charleston City Council
candidate Louin Poston owes $140,596 and Eastover Town Councilman Richard
Johnson owes $90,300, the commission said.
House Speaker Bobby Harrell said he was not aware of any pending fines
against state lawmakers.
The bill passed this year would give the biggest debtors a break on the
fines.
'The Ethics Commission asked for the legislation,' said Harrell,
R-Charleston.
But in his veto letter, Sanford called it 'the latest and most disturbing
example of the Legislature's retreat from the ethics reforms it passed in the
wake of the Operation Lost Trust scandal.'
That FBI vote-selling sting prompted a sweeping overhaul of the state's
ethics laws in 1991 that tightened reporting requirements and outlawed lobbyists
handling political contributions.
Sanford wrote 'we have fallen back to a time where special interests are once
again making inroads into the legislative process' and he was 'very concerned
about the recent trend in the General Assembly toward a closed, secretive
system.'
The chairmen of the House and Senate ethics committees were not available for
comment Thursday.
In his veto message, the governor also took the Legislature to task for only
taking recorded roll call votes 13 percent of the time since he took office in
2003. With the ethics bill, the Senate passed a proposal 'that would lower
ethics standards and bail out legislators for past violations of the ethics
laws' with a non-recorded voice vote, Sanford wrote.