Mischief plagues
District 5 campaigns Allegations
include vandalism, theft of political signs and improper
e-mails By BILL
ROBINSON Staff
Writer
Campaign shenanigans during school board election season in
Lexington-Richland 5 are as common as pumpkins on front porches this
time of year.
No one knows that better than Wayne Duncan of Chapin, a
self-proclaimed political neophyte who landed in hot water earlier
this week with the Richland County Sheriff’s Department.
Duncan is suspected of tampering with a sign promoting incumbent
Robert Gantt of Irmo. Duncan supports Gantt’s opponent, Kim Murphy
of Chapin.
The incident is among a flurry of electioneering tactics
attracting attention in District 5 as candidates and supporters
jockey to influence races. The competition is tight, with four
incumbents facing stiff challenges. The activities in question also
include e-mails sent to school employees and a mass mailing from a
nonprofit organization that advocates less government oversight.
Richland Sheriff Leon Lott said his agency took the sign
tampering complaint seriously. “I want to send a message. This stuff
has got to stop,” he said.
Duncan was confronted a week ago by a District 5 teacher, who
said she saw him dismantling a Gantt sign on private property near
Dutch Fork Elementary School. Duncan said he was carrying out a
request from Murphy’s husband, who Duncan said told him the property
owner wanted Gantt’s sign removed.
Duncan acknowledged Wednesday he made a mistake. He noted the
incident occurred at 4:30 p.m. in full view of passing motorists on
a busy thoroughfare.
Kim Murphy characterized the episode as a miscommunication
between two relatives who apparently had differing views about
allowing candidates’ use of their property.
“I try to play by the rules,” Murphy said.
Lt. Joe Pellicci said investigators have not decided whether to
recommend charges.
If the Sheriff’s Department concludes a crime occurred, Gantt
said he would have to decide whether to pursue charges.
Duncan could face charges of petty larceny or malicious injury to
property, both misdemeanors, Lott said.
The Gantt-Murphy race has been a hot topic in the Irmo-Chapin
area since Murphy filed for the seat, which pays $3,750 a year.
Murphy and Gantt say their campaigns have been plagued by sign theft
and vandalism.
In late September, the state Ethics Commission alerted District 5
leaders that it was aware of alleged electioneering on school
grounds and using school equipment, primarily at Dutch Fork High
School. All inferred the activities favored Gantt, whose wife works
at the school.
Gantt denies directing anyone affiliated with District 5 schools
to do anything that would give his campaign an advantage over
Murphy.
“That’s not how I operate,” he said.
Gantt also is the object of a mailing paid for by South
Carolinians for Responsible Government. It reminds recipients the
incumbent is at the center of allegations made to the Ethics
Commission.
“We’re interested in more efficient and responsible government,”
spokesman Denver Merrill said. “That isn’t exclusive to state
government.”
The organization formed in 2003 to support Gov. Mark Sanford’s
proposal to give tax credits to parents of children educated outside
public schools.
“It was incumbent on us to inform and educate other folks in the
district how their tax dollars are potentially going to be spent,”
Merrill said.
The group, which Merrill said rents office space in Columbia from
political consultant Richard Quinn, acted independently and did not
seek Murphy’s endorsement or permission before the mailing went
out.
Merrill said the organization plans to distribute another
mailing, urging recipients to call Gantt and incumbent Cindy
Sweigart, who have voted for property tax increases in the past.
Incumbent Paula Hite, who has opposed tax increases, is not
mentioned.
In another matter, Jerry Fowler of Chapin, running for one of
three seats reserved for Lexington County residents on the Nov. 2
ballot, drew the ire of District 5 educators for electronic messages
he sent this week to their computers at work.
One praised teachers for their hard work and promised “help is on
the way.” A second offered what he called a “sincere explanation”
about why he sent the first e-mail.
District 5 spokesman Buddy Price said he told Fowler his actions
were inappropriate.
The Ethics Commission issued an advisory in 2003 that says
campaign-related e-mails sent to a public employee and received on a
government computer violate ethics laws.
“I did not send them anything asking for a vote,” Fowler said.
“It was just a ‘thank-you’ for what you’ve done.”
Reach Robinson at (803) 771-8482 or brobinson@thestate.com. |