Sanford wants
surplus put toward deficit Revenue
projections are higher than expected as Senate takes up
budget By JIM
DAVENPORT The Associated
Press
Gov. Mark Sanford urged the Senate on Monday to pump any money
from an expected state surplus into repaying a $155 million deficit
left from the 2002 budget year.
The Senate will begin debating the state’s $5.3 billion spending
plan today. The Finance Committee’s budget includes a $110 million
projected budget surplus based on tax collections rising faster than
expected this year.
Rating agencies have put the state’s ability to repay debt on
watch lists, raising concerns that South Carolina would have to pay
more to borrow money, Sanford said. Those concerns had been
addressed previously when Sanford and the House and Senate budget
leaders embraced plans to repay the deficit in $50 million chunks
during the next three years.
But, Sanford asked, “What do we do ... if it turns out we do run
a surplus?” When financial leaders discussed proposals to deal with
an unconstitutional deficit, he said, no one expected a surplus.
Meanwhile, the deficit repayment measure hasn’t reached Sanford’s
desk. Reporting companies “are going to be looking closely at what
we do,” he said.
Comptroller General Richard Eckstrom says the surplus is no sure
thing. The Board of Economic Advisors “has been unwilling to take a
stand that money will materialize,” he said.
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence,
used a Board of Economic Advisors report to include the projected
surplus in the Senate’s budget. The BEA, which said last month that
revenues were running ahead of expectations, could revise its
official projections when it meets in two weeks.
“There are a lot of uncertainties,” Sanford said. “Bad news can
come in surprisingly short form these days.”
Leatherman had to hunt for cash because his committee dumped
parts of Sanford’s and the House’s revenue plans, including the
governor’s proposal to balance the budget partly by selling surplus
cars.
Leatherman has said dealing with the deficit is a lower priority
than avoiding reductions in school and health care spending. |