Good Morning,
First, let me congratulate the
leadership and members of the SCCA for winning the ACA’s Blanche La Du Award,
for the highest percentage of membership growth over the past twelve months.
SCCA President Clay Catoe and President Elect Cecilia Reynolds accepted the
award at a recent ACA meeting.
Despite rocky economic times, the
employees of this agency continue to accomplish our mission of providing safe
prisons, serving inmates and others, and being good stewards of the resources
provided.
The current budget crisis has forced
us all to cut down on travel…but I am confident that each of you continues to
focus on details to ensure that our prisons are ALWAYS immaculately clean, neat
and orderly places. Attention to detail matters. It sends a clear message that
we care about our duties and it spills over into everything that we do. Neglect
of these basics sends the message that we do not care…that spills over as well.
For the past six years, legislative
budget leaders have made a point of proving that they have exclusive power over
the budget, over-riding vetoes with glee, literally boasting about their power
and gloating about their reckless and unsustainable spending decisions.
When Governor Sanford suggested that
they set aside funds for a rainy day, fund core services like corrections, and
control spending, the state’s leading budget writer even called the governor,
elected twice by the people of this state, nothing more than a “chicken little.”
Now, the sky has fallen and that
same senator has suggested that we cut salaries for correctional officers to
cover years of legislative mismanagement.
I hope that each of you understand
the dire financial situation that legislative budget leaders have created: it is
nothing short of a disaster. And, if this agency were to be forced by lawmakers
to implement cuts of the size required by their mismanagement, it will create
safety and security nightmares.
As he has for six years, Governor
Sanford says “no” to such recklessness and continues to urge lawmakers to exempt
this agency from further cuts. Unfortunately, past mismanagement of state’s
budget will still force us to make dangerous cuts and report a deficit.
Thankfully, at present, lawmakers seem to be heeding the Governor’s advice to
minimize further cuts to this agency.
I have long believed that our most
marginal activities, such as inmate education and chaplains services, are more
core to state government than the most essential missions and purposes of many
funded activities and organizations, including but not limited to local grants,
expenditures on lobbyists, relic rooms, museums, art commissions, human affairs,
energy and film offices, archives, duplicative ‘economic development’ entities,
extension services, enterprise architecture, business services, the office of
local government, the office of research and statistics, real property
management, and ever-growing expenditures on education that continue to produce
no better outcomes.
Recently, legislative budget leaders
asked this agency to submit a list of expenditures that represent our most
marginal expenditures. Below is the Introduction to our response to that
request.
This administration is not advocating for
any of the spending cut proposals put forth in this
Memorandum. SCDC’s position remains consistent with Governor
Sanford’s: we believe that Corrections should be held harmless throughout this
crisis, which was predicted, avoidable and exacerbated by years of neglect of
this agency. Sadly, because the budgetary proposals, advice, and predictions of
this administration and others went unheeded, year after year, public safety may
be jeopardized and the safety and economic security of state employees may be
lost.
We do not advocate for the early release of
inmates or the closing of prisons. Likewise, we do not advocate for further cuts
in any of the line items listed in option two.
As a direct consequence of the failure to
heed warnings and spend and save wisely, legislative budget staff has now asked
us to recommend cuts to this agency. For this reason only, we are submitting
this response. In doing so, we are compelled to put forth the safest avenue
to make the drastic and inherently dangerous cuts that budget writers and
lawmakers may force upon this agency. We do so only in response to your
request.
These options require the specific
legislative relief that we have included. Closing prisons or implementing cuts
without the specific legislative tools, protections and relief requested would
be so dangerous as to constitute gross negligence or recklessness in violation
of our fiduciary duties.
Option one is dangerous and risky for
reasons that are self apparent. However, any of the potential cuts listed in
Option two are even more dangerous.
Legislative neglect has already created
funding and staffing shortages in this agency. Even with no further cuts, budget
writers have forced the employees of this agency to accept more risk than 47
other state legislatures.
Even in our security ranks, with hundreds
of lost positions, security posts that have long been unmanned and years of
legislative refusal to fund adequate technology to plug those holes, we cannot
guarantee that we can safely manage the inmate population with further
cuts.
Eliminating programming within an already
bare-bones system will virtually guarantee bad outcomes as inmate
idleness, hopelessness, isolation, and frustration will lead to anger,
assaultive behavior, and escapes.
These bad outcomes may go unnoticed by
lawmakers and the public.
However, riots, hostage situations,
homicides and suicides will likely garner more attention. Similar to the current
budget situation, all of these bad outcomes are predictable and avoidable: even
now, after years of neglect and cuts, we urge you to follow the Governor’s
advice and hold this agency harmless.
Let me repeat: these options are inherently
dangerous. We recommend no part of either
option.
As you can see, this administration
continues to recognize the efficiency and frugality of this agency.
Lawmakers have ignored the warnings
and advice of the Governor for six years. As the legislature reconvenes to
confront this self-created mess, we are hopeful that they will not ask the
employees of this agency to pay the price, yet again, for their reckless
spending decisions.
Thought you ought to
know.
Keep up the good
work.