Republicans find it
tough to replace Campbell
JIM
DAVENPORT Associated
Press
COLUMBIA, S.C. - Former Gov. Carroll Campbell
moved the state's Republican Party from the minority to dominance
and used charisma and hardball to become a political leader and GOP
icon.
His death Wednesday comes as the party finds plenty to divide it
and no clear leader stepping forward to unite it. The divisions are
everywhere: Upstate vs. Lowcountry, social conservatives vs. fiscal
conservatives and whether partisans supported President Bush or
Arizona Sen. John McCain in the 2000 presidential primary here.
No one has Campbell's stature to step forward and "be sort of a
super statesman and regulate family squabbles" within the Republican
Party, Doug Woodard, a Clemson University political scientist and
GOP strategist, said.
Campbell, governor from 1987 to 1995, had a knack that most
others lacked for "bargaining and meeting and greeting and coddling
of egos," Woodard said.
When issues created divides while Campbell was in office, he
would sit around a table with Christian conservatives, business
people and party regulars and "he could lay down the law to all of
them," said Neal Thigpen, a Francis Marion University political
science professor and longtime Republican. "You haven't got that
now."
The principle under Campbell's leadership was "you keep your
divisions buried. you hide your divisions," Winthrop University
political science professor Scott Huffmon said. That helped the
Republican Party win elections and become dominant, he said.
If someone emerges to fill Campbell's role as party uniter, it
would be a mistake to assume that person "will be like Campbell at
all," Huffmon said.
"It will take a different kind of leader to unite a fractious
Republican Party," he said.
It's a job that traditionally falls to governors in states.
Gov. Mark Sanford should take on that role, but "he's done just
about as much as he can to disunite the party," Thigpen said.
State GOP Chairman Katon Dawson said it was an unfair rap on
Sanford.
He has "been a different kind of governor," Dawson said, but he
has "brought a lot of new people into the political process that we
didn't have before."
While Campbell would encourage people to get behind an idea and
push that through the Legislature, Sanford "put the big ideas out
there and lets the (legislative) process work," Dawson said. "It has
made people uncomfortable."
Sanford spokesman Joel Sawyer said Campbell also had a different
role, leading a smaller party. Smaller parties, he said. "are always
more cohesive." With Republican dominance now, "you're naturally
going to have a less cohesive party simply by virtue of the fact
that it's the biggest game in town." Still, he said, people tend to
focus too much on disagreements without acknowledging Republicans
share many common goals.
College of Charleston political science professor Bill Moore says
Campbell's influence on the party diminished from the time he left
office. His two Republican successors have had a difficult time
influencing the party, he said.
Former Gov. David Beasley followed Campbell into the Gov.'s
Mansion, but he divided the party with his stances on the
Confederate flag and was less popular among fiscal conservatives
than Christian conservatives, Moore said.
And Sanford, "is a maverick and takes his own positions" and
those sometimes put him at odds with other Republicans, Moore
said.
Beyond Sanford taking a more visible role leading his party,
there are others who could take up to the task, political scientists
say, including U.S. Sens. Lindsey Graham and Jim DeMint, U.S. Rep.
Joe Wilson, House Speaker Bobby Harrell and his predecessor, U.S.
Ambassador David Wilkins.
But "you've also got be willing to seize the mantle," Thigpen
said.
That no one appears to be willing to do that leaves Republicans,
clearly dominant in Legislature and statewide offices, in an odd
position.
"If you ask who speaks for the Republican Party today, you have a
choir instead of a soloist," Moore said. |