Story last updated at 7:58 a.m. Wednesday, October 1, 2003
S.C. government needs changes, panel urges
Associated Press
COLUMBIA--Gov. Mark Sanford's commission on
state reform suggested Tuesday that South Carolina's government must be
streamlined like a business and made more accountable to better serve
residents.
"State government is, in many senses, broken, and is in need of
repair," the Commission on Management, Accountability and Performance said
in a report submitted to Sanford. "State government needs to be seriously
overhauled in order to maximize efficiency and worker productivity."
Ken Wingate, chairman of the panel and a former gubernatorial
candidate, said the state "suffers from agency gridlock" with some 55
independent agencies, boards and commissions, besides its 13 separate
Cabinet agencies. This fragmentation of South Carolina government has led
to redundancies that are wasteful and unnecessary, he said.
He said the panel found enough such practices that could be eliminated,
changed or consolidated to save $250 million in the first year and more
than $300 million a year down the road -- good news as the state struggles
with tough economic times and budget deficits.
For example, Wingate said his panel found 74 separate accounting
systems. He said the commission also discovered the state has 8,000
buildings but they are not overseen by a common authority.
Sanford, who said he'd not yet read the report, pledged to work with
legislators and commission members on laws or executive actions that could
bring the new ideas to fruition.
Sanford created the commission in June to study government
accountability and performance and to cut waste. The panel was composed of
12 business leaders from across the state who paid their own costs to
serve, Wingate said.
Sanford had pushed reform plans to eliminate elections for most
constitutional officers, putting their responsibilities and powers under
the governor's office.
In its report, the panel acknowledged it was divided on the extent to
which the number of top government posts should be elected vs. appointed.
It called for restructuring the executive branch by reducing elected
offices from nine to six. That would end election of the state education
superintendent and adjutant general and eliminate the office of Secretary
of State, moving those duties to the Department of Revenue.