Historic diversity
in the S.C. House Haley will be 1st
Sikh to take legislative seat anywhere in the
U.S. HENRY
EICHEL Columbia
Bureau
COLUMBIA - It was news last month when
political newcomer Nikki Haley defeated South Carolina's
longest-serving state House member, Rep. Larry Koon, in the
Republican primary runoff. With no Democratic opponent, her election
in November is assured.
But Haley's victory also marks a milestone of a different sort:
When the 32-year-old Lexington businesswoman takes office, she will
become the first person of Asian Indian descent to be an S.C.
lawmaker, and the first member of the Sikh religion to join a state
legislature in the United States.
That fact got little notice in South Carolina. Haley, who was
born in Bamberg and graduated from Clemson University, has little
about her to suggest her ethnic background.
"I don't think it was really talked about," said state Republican
Party Executive Director Luke Byers. "Most of the folks out there
just saw her as a fresh face, someone new and different."
"Out there" is House District 87, a chunk of central Lexington
County that used to be mostly rural, but is rapidly filling with new
suburban developments.
"Twenty years ago, Larry Koon fit that district to a T," said
Byers. "Now, Nikki Haley fits that district to a T. It used to be
dominated by people who had been there for years and years. Now
you've got such an infusion of new families, folks from all over the
country."
Much more than in South Carolina, Haley's Indian parentage has
made news in media serving the Indian community in the United
States, and even in some newspapers in India itself. Many writers
saw her win as symbolic.
"For Sikhs, who have been subjected to periodic racial profiling
since the 9/11 attacks, Haley's triumph is an important political
victory," wrote the Hindustan Times. "She has promised to be a
spokesperson for Sikhs and other Indian Americans."
Not true, said Haley. "I haven't promised to be a spokesperson
for anybody. What I have said is that I will fight discrimination
against any group. Those articles that are being written, they're
all kind of putting their take on it."
But, she said, "That doesn't mean I'm not proud and feel good
about my background."
Haley's parents emigrated from Amritsar, in northwest India, to
Canada in 1964, then to the United States in 1969. Her father, Ajit
Randhawa, is a retired biology professor who chaired the science
department at Voorhees College in Denmark. Her mother, Raj, runs a
$1.8 million-a-year retail clothing firm in Columbia, Exotica
International, that she started in a Bamberg motel room in 1976.
Nikki Haley is the company's comptroller.
"All the Indian and Sikh community is feeling proud of her," her
mother said.
People of Indian origin or descent are a tiny minority in South
Carolina. The 2000 Census counted only 8,300 in the state, or 0.2
percent of the population.
The Sikh religion is a monotheistic faith that fuses elements of
Hinduism and Islam, teaching that God transcends religious
distinctions.
Haley said that during the campaign, she was often questioned
about her religion. "I was born and raised with the Sikh faith, my
husband and I were married in the Methodist Church, our children
have been baptized in the Methodist Church, and currently we attend
both," she said.
Before this year, she went by the name of Nikki Randhawa-Haley.
But she dropped her maiden name once she began campaigning. "It
wouldn't fit on a yard sign," she said.
Koon's campaign never openly raised the issue of Haley's
ethnicity, although it did point out in a mailing and a newspaper ad
that she is registered to vote as "Nimrata N. Randhawa." Nikki is
Haley's middle name.
Rod Shealy, Koon's campaign consultant, denied any attempt to
make Haley's ancestry an issue. "There is no Nikki Haley registered,
and I finally deduced that this other name was, in fact, her," he
said. "The point was that she had voted in only one primary, as a
Democrat."
Haley's campaign also reported having seen an e-mail that said,
"Please remember that she is a Buddhist....I can only vote for a
Christian." Shealy said the Koon campaign had nothing to do with
such tactics. "At no point was her religion raised by the campaign,"
he said. "Now, whatever word of mouth might have existed, might have
existed."
Campaign consultant Walt Whetsell, who worked for Haley in the
runoff, said the tactics were part of an effort by the opposing camp
to make voters aware of her background.
"Lexington County is unfairly stereotyped as a place where that
kind of tactic might work," Whetsell said. "But this election flies
in the face of that."
Clemson University political science professor Bruce Ransom, who
studies minority group politics, said Haley's win contains little in
terms of broader implications.
"She didn't run on her ethnic background, and by having only a
limited number of members of that community, she wasn't looking for
a voting bloc," he said. "She ran as a mainstream candidate."
If there is a lesson to be drawn, Ransom said, "it's that when
voters knew about (her background), it apparently didn't make a
difference. Therefore, those who made a point of it had to be
subtle, because of fear that there might be a backlash." |