Date Published: May 31, 2006
Sanford prepares to call Legislature back
By JIM DAVENPORT Associated
Press Writer
The House and Senate have agreed to come back on
June 14 to take up vetoes. That has Gov. Mark Sanford drafting
a letter telling them to come back next week
instead.
The governor is delivering on the threat he
made Tuesday to call legislators back to deal with budget
vetoes before the June 13 primary, his spokesman Joel Sawyer
said.
It's unclear whether the Legislature will comply
with Sanford's demand.
Sanford argues voters need to
see whether legislators support his vetoes as they decide who
to vote for in the 24 contested House primary races on June
13. All 124 House seats are up for election in November. The
Senate's 46 senators don't face voters until 2008.
"Our
view is they are legally compelled to," Sawyer
said.
Since the General Assembly technically would
still be in session, Sanford can't call them back, said Senate
President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell,
R-Charleston.
McConnell said complying with Sanford's
demand could set a bad precedent and blur lines between the
executive and legislative branches.
Senate Majority
Leader Harvey Peeler, R-Gaffney, said agreeing to come back
could prompt a governor to call legislators back to work on
weekends during the regular legislative session. "We could
recess for lunch and he could call us back from lunch," Peeler
said.
Sen. David Thomas, R-Fountain Inn, said that
would be unreasonable and irrational. What Sanford is "talking
about here is not unreasonable and irrational. And that's the
difference. If he calls us back to take up vetoes prior to the
primary, we're going to be here," Thomas said.
Legal
counsel for House Speaker Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, found a
1984 attorney general's opinion citing Wisconsin law that says
governors can call the Legislature back between their
adjournment date and an add-on session.
But attorney
general opinions aren't law and don't have the weight of a
court decision. And McConnell isn't putting much stock in
Wisconsin law.
That could force Sanford to go to court
to force the Legislature to return to their desks. Sawyer said
that decision hasn't been made. "We'll cross that bridge when
and if we come to it," he said.
On Wednesday, House
leaders tried to amend Senate plans and come back on June 7
instead of June 14.
The 67-38 vote killing that effort
prompted House Majority Leader Jim Merrill, R-Daniel Island,
to warn colleagues they were playing a high-stakes political
game with a Republican governor and his nearly $5 million
campaign war chest. Legislators have long complained that
Sanford's re-election strategy hinges on blaming the
Legislature for everything.
"We're handing him a
gigantic hammer right now," Merrill said. "I'm not sure the
political consequences are worth going through
that."
Rep. Todd Rutherford, D-Columbia, told the House
to stand up to Sanford.
"He's been running against some
of you the four years that he's been in office. He wants you
to have to come back when you've got primary opposition the
week before the primary and defend yourself from his vetoes.
That is ridiculous," Rutherford said.
"Stand up and
stand your ground and tell him and tell the press and
everybody else that ... he is playing political games to gain
ground and that's all this is," Rutherford said to cheers from
the House floor.
If Sanford calls legislators back, it
will cost $80,000 a day for as long as they decide to stay in
Columbia because South Carolina governors can order the
Legislature back to their desks, but they can't tell them what
to do or when to leave. The resolution the House and Senate
passed limits their work to mostly handling vetoes for a
maximum of three days at a cost of around $50,000 a
day
"If he has an emergency session to call you back on
the seventh, who has made the decision to spend taxpayer
money? Not you, him," said Rep. Ted Pitts,
R-Lexington.
"This doesn't have to cost taxpayers an
extra dime," Sawyer said. "They could cut a check back to the
general fund."
Rep. Gilda Cobb-Hunter, D-Orangeburg,
said Sanford already has the House where he wants
it.
"Some of you are slow learners and you don't seem
to understand you cannot win with this guy when it comes to
making us the fall guys with the public," Cobb-Hunter said.
"You ain't going to outsmart him, I'm telling you. The boy got
it going on with the public and he's going to win the game and
not us."
|

|
|

|
|