The Put Private
Schools in Charge Act
By LINDA A.
LEE Guest
columnist
The governor’s top education agenda item in 2005 is called the
Put Parents In Charge Act. Sounds wonderful, doesn’t it? However,
what does it really mean? Aren’t parents already in charge of their
children’s education?
Basically, the governor’s proposed legislation is about money. It
does nothing to address academics or accountability for educational
performance. The Put Parents In Charge Act is designed to give
families and scholarship-granting organizations tax credits to pay
for private school tuition or to fund home schooling.
It must be noted that families must pay initially for the tuition
and then receive income tax and property tax credits at the end of
the year. Can average households afford $4,000 per child to enroll
in private schools and then wait until the end of the year to see
what percentage of tax credit (based on family annual income) they
qualify for?
Don’t fool yourself into thinking parents would be in charge of
where their children could go to school. Private schools make the
final decision about whether they will accept children. They can
consider such things as behavior, academic performance and family
backgrounds when deciding on their enrollment. Public schools
accept, and strive to teach, all students. Public schools also teach
students to accept and work with all students.
Though public dollars would be used to fund private education for
a select few, there is no public accountability for these dollars.
There is no PACT or exit exam requirement for students attending
private schools. Surely our state cannot justify diverting public
monies into private tuitions with no accountability to taxpayers.
Should all our taxpayers be required to fund private education?
South Carolina public schools have made significant academic
gains since the landmark Education Accountability Act of 1998. The
2004 annual school and district report cards showed that of more
than 1,100 schools, only 28 are rated unsatisfactory. Despite
increasing rigor in the rating scale, schools performed at a higher
level than ever before.
Our state’s PACT is among the most challenging assessments
nationwide. This year, only one district in the state was rated
unsatisfactory. In the past six years, South Carolina has emphasized
proficiency in education for all students. Administrators, teachers,
students and family members have worked together toward
accountability and success.
This year’s school and district report cards affirm that public
schools are making improvements and are on the path to accomplish
our goals for all students in South Carolina.
Educators are asking legislators to recognize our accomplishments
and to continue to support public education. Diverting public monies
to private education, especially with no accountability in place, is
a slap in the face to public education and to all of the progress
our state has made.
Public tax dollars should remain in public schools. Parents can
only be “put in charge” when they actively participate in their
children’s education. Many parents see positive results achieved in
the public education system because they stay involved. However,
these successes will be in jeopardy if public dollars are diverted
to private education. Our state cannot afford to fund two separate
education systems, one private and one public.
As public educators, my colleagues and I are asking the public to
contact legislators. Please ask them to make the right choice and
support public education. Please don’t be misled by the catchy title
of the “Put Parents In Charge Act.” It is a fancy way of
implementing a voucher system.
States such as Minnesota, Florida and Arizona that have already
implemented similar programs are encountering financial and legal
problems. Our state would be far better-served by continuing to
support the public education system that is emphasizing academic
proficiency for all of its children.
Ms. Lee is 2003-2004 Union County teacher of the year and
chairperson of the Union County Schools’ District Teacher Advisory
Committee. |