South Carolina in
red & blue Swing counties again
hold the key to this year’s elections By JEFF STENSLAND Staff Writer
Want to know whether Inez Tenenbaum or Jim DeMint will win South
Carolina’s up-for-grabs U.S. Senate seat?
Don’t waste your time canvassing partisan strongholds like
Richland, Lexington, Greenville and Orangeburg counties.
Instead, ask around in Kershaw, Newberry, Saluda and that oldest
of S.C. political hotbeds, Charleston County.
Those are some of the state’s 15 swing counties, where the
majority of voters have an uncanny ability to pick a winner.
All 15 of those swing counties went for Republican Lindsey Graham
in his successful 2002 U.S. Senate race against Democrat Alex
Sanders.
Those same 15 counties all voted in larger numbers for Democrat
Jim Hodgesover incumbent Republican Gov. David Beasley in 1998.
In 2002, 13 of them went for Republican Mark Sanford instead of
Hodges.
An analysis of voting patterns in recent elections shows South
Carolina counties can be divided into three categories — 21 “blue”
counties that typically vote Democratic, 10 “red” counties that
consistently tilt Republican and the 15 swing counties:
• Blue counties generally are more
rural and have a much higher percentage of black residents than the
state average. Residents also tend to be below the state average
educationally and earn less than those in Republican and swing
counties.
• Red counties have a
disproportionate percentage of white residents, earn above the
state’s average income and have larger population centers.
• Swing counties are somewhere in
the middle and come closer to mirroring the state as a whole than
either red or blue counties.
South Carolina elects its officials by popular vote — not through
the complicated Electoral College process that has President Bush
and John Kerry obsessing over a handful of swing states.
In the homestretch of the race between DeMint and Tenenbaum,
strategists on both sides have put together game plans for one final
appeal to voters.
They might choose to shore up their support among traditional
Republican or Democratic strongholds. Or they might go after the
elusive swing voters who still can be swayed one way or another.
Maybe they’ll do both.
Wyeth Ruthven, communications director for the S.C. Democratic
Party, said voting patterns among individuals are more important
than how a county leans.
And Luke Byars, executive director of the S.C. Republican Party,
said “we feel we need to be everywhere.”
But if history is any guide, odds are that many of the
battleground counties — like Kershaw, Newberry and Florence — once
again will play a big role in deciding whether Tenenbaum or DeMint
represents South Carolina in the U.S. Senate.
Reach Stensland at (803) 771-8358 or jstensland@thestate.com |