NORTH AUGUSTA, S.C. - Many community leaders here
welcome a possible $4 billion plutonium pit facility at the Savannah
River Site, saying it would bring hundreds of new jobs, but
environmentalists aren't sure it's worth the health risk.
The Department of Energy is expected to decide in April on the
pit project, and choose from among SRS and four other sites. A
public meeting on an environmental study of the pit plant will be
held Monday in North Augusta.
An initial screening by the Energy Department ranked SRS second,
behind the Los Alamos, N.M., National Laboratory. Other sites being
weighed are the government's Pantex Plant near Amarillo, Texas; the
Waste Isolation Pilot Plant near Carlsbad, N.M.; and the Nevada Test
Site near Las Vegas.
Protesters showed up Tuesday at the Los Alamos, N.M., site. The
South Carolina meeting, however, promises a more welcoming group of
politicians, civic leaders and economic-development officials.
The new facility could offer as many as 1,800 new jobs for up to
50 years. SRS now employs more than 13,000 people.
"There is no nuclear Department of Energy site in the country
whose community supports it more strongly. I guarantee you we'll
have every mayor within 50 miles there supporting it," said Mal
McKibben, a retired SRS nuclear chemist and director of the
pro-nuclear Citizens for Nuclear Technology Awareness in Aiken.
While Texas and New Mexico have the support of powerful Western
senators, SRS offers a unique 50-year history of handling
plutonium.
For decades SRS supplied the nation's nuclear arsenal with
plutonium, producing 36 tons between 1953 and 1988. Since then the
site's chief mission has been cleaning up and stabilizing the
millions of gallons of waste left behind.
"SRS is all about plutonium. So I've got to say it looks like the
logical choice, if you follow that line of reasoning, which we
don't," said Glenn Carroll of Georgians Against Nuclear Energy.
Opponents like Carroll don't believe the U.S. needs more
weaponry. More than 12,000 pits already are stored at Pantex, where
nuclear weapons are assembled.
More than 125 advocacy groups urged Congress last month to block
the pit plant, saying it would waste money, endanger the public and
pose a security risk.
DOE's National Nuclear Security Administration says its weapons
are aging. While no significant degradation has been detected, an
agency report said last month, the nation's nuclear stockpile could
become unreliable as impurities and corrosion accumulate.
The nation hasn't had a source of pits since the DOE's Rocky
Flats plant in Golden, Colo., was shut down in 1989. As an interim
measure, Los Alamos will begin making up to 20 pits a year in 2007.
The full-scale plant will make 125 to 450 a year.
SRS currently recycles tritium from dismantled weapons, and in
2007 will open a new tritium-extraction facility. It also has also
been chosen as the site of a new plant to make mixed-oxide, or MOX,
fuel, using 34 metric tons of surplus weapons plutonium.
Unlike former Democratic Gov. Jim Hodges, who threatened to lie
down in front of incoming tractor-trailers bearing plutonium, new
Republican Gov. Mark Sanford has embraced the plant projects.
Within a week of taking office in January, Sanford met with U.S.
Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham to support both the MOX and
plutonium-pit projects.
"From an economic development and quality-of-life standpoint, the
governor has been very involved," said spokesman Will Folks. "He
sees it as an opportunity for Savannah River to have a new
mission."
Not everyone is happy about the plant's possible new mission. The
Rev. Charles Utley leads a nearby community group in Augusta, Ga.,
whose members have complained for years that chemicals from
surrounding industries have tainted their neighborhoods.
"They're afraid," said Utley, community organizer for the Blue
Ridge Environmental Defense League. "Patriotism is fine and jobs are
fine, but good health would supersede both of them."