OVERCAST
63°

Thursday  October 21, 2004

** ELECTION 2004 INFORMATION**

Site Map Subscribe Contact Us

Front
News
Sports
Obituaries
Entertainment
Comics
State News
AP News
Lottery Results
Classifieds
Lifestyles
Panorama
Police Blotter
Movies
Opinion
Clarendon
Business
Outdoors
Public Record
A Look Back
Photo Gallery
The Messenger

Weather
Event Calendar
Business Directory
Staff Directory
T.V. Listings
Links

Retail
Classified
Special Sections

E-mail
Movie Trivia
Forums
Chat
Match.com

Network Support
Web Development
Web Hosting

October
S M T W T F S
26
27
28
29
30
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
1
2
3
4
5
6

Date Published: October 21, 2004   

Campaign coffers set for final push

By LESLIE CANTU
Item Staff Writer
lesliec@theitem.com

With a little more than a week left to push their candidacies, the four state Senate candidates in Districts 35 and 36 are in wildly divergent financial positions.

State Sen. Phil Leventis, D-Sumter, has $11,470 on hand, according to his pre-election filing with the Senate Ethics Committee. Challenger Dickie Jones, on the other hand, has $110,198 left to spend.

In the last period, Leventis out-raised and outspent Jones, raising $58,223 and spending $71,655. Jones raised $40,424 in the last period and spent $34,222. However, he has also been the beneficiary of advertising paid for by the South Carolina Republican Party.

State Sen. John Land, D-Manning, still has $53,816 in his campaign account, but his opponent, Bob Gibbons, has only $211 left.

Jones received 13 donations of $1,000 in the last period, including $3,000 from poultry and pork farms and $1,000 from the Farm Bureau.

The South Carolina Farm Bureau and the South Carolina Poultry Federation pressed for passage of the “right-to-farm” bill in the spring. The Farm Bureau saw the bill as protection from regulations that differ from county to county by not allowing local governments to pass more stringent requirements than those passed by the General Assembly, and said the bill would still allow counties to choose not to zone an area agricultural if it didn’t want poultry farms there. Livestock regulations would be science-based under DHEC’s administration, the organizations argued.

Leventis opposed the bill because he said it removed control from the local level.

“What the agricultural industry wants is for Columbia to issue permits for confined animal feeder operations and for the local government to have no control over that,” Leventis said.

Leventis said he has assisted agricultural businesses like Goldkist in the past by protecting a tax loophole that doesn’t require them to pay a tax on the fuel used to heat barns, because passing the cost on to consumers would raise the price prohibitively.

“I don’t want Columbia directing what goes on in Sumter and Lee,” Leventis said. “Sumter and Lee have passed laws to set standards for where confined animal feeder operations can go.”

Jones said the right to farm legislation was important to Goldkist, Sumter County’s largest employer after Shaw Air Force Base. The legislation would have made life easier for Goldkist, which operates out of several different counties and faces different regulations in each one, he said.

“There is a provision in that bill that this would not intrude on the county’s home rule,” Jones said. “A place like Goldkist ... they need some kind of uniform regulation that would apply across the board.

“This is one of those issues where state regulation is probably better than local regulation,” he said.

Jones said Leventis wouldn’t listen to Goldkist when it approached him about the bill. He also said that South Carolina already has one of the toughest livestock regulations in the nation.

Nancy Vinson of the Coastal Conservation League doesn’t agree with that. She said the setbacks that DHEC promulgated for hog and poultry farms after the Swine Bill of 1996 are minimums that are more lax than the setbacks suggested by the American Society of Agricultural Engineers.

The society recommends one-mile setbacks from public areas while the state requires only 600-foot setbacks, she said, and it recommends one-quarter to one-half mile setbacks from neighboring residences while the state only requires 1,000-foot setbacks.

Jones said 1,500-foot setbacks would force farms to have at least 266 acres to conduct business.

Most of the farms interested in this bill aren’t mom-and-pop operations, Leventis said.

“I have held hearings on things that are directly related to this and had a lot of farmers who share the same concerns I do about land-use planning,” Leventis said. He added that he is trying to find some middle ground on this issue.

Goldkist deserves more consideration, Jones said, because they have been good neighbors.

“The way Goldkist works, if there’s severe objections, they don’t want to go in there,” he said.

Leventis received 10 donations of $1,000 in the last period, including $1,000 from Vinson, and a $5,000 donation from the Senate Democratic Caucus.

Leventis and Jones will meet at 7 p.m. tonight at a debate in the Nettles Building auditorium on the campus of the University of South Carolina Sumter. The public is invited to attend the debate, which will be broadcast on WDXY 1240 AM and WIBZ 95.5 FM.


Contact Staff Writer Leslie Cantu at lesliec@theitem.com or 803-774-1250.

E-mail to a friend

Previous Page

Copyright © The Item.com.  All Rights Reserved.
Site design and layout by SCnetSolutions.