I am deeply concerned about a statement attributed to me (The Sun
News, Nov. 8) regarding my role as a legislator in appointing
judges. The comment was made as part of my reaction to the proposed
methadone clinic's attempt to block a public hearing of the Board of
Adjustments and Zoning Appeals.
I had just learned that I had been named in a lawsuit seeking
possible monetary damages against me and Horry County, along with an
injunction against a public hearing that my constituents have
rightly demanded. I will not deny making the statement, but I am
absolutely certain that it was taken out of context.
In the discourse of conversation, I recall answering many
questions about the clinic and my strong opposition to it. The
statement was made as a matter of fact and was not intended to leave
the impression that judges answer to me or any other legislator.
Like me, our judges take a solemn oath to uphold our
constitution, and I know they will do so.
While the backers of this clinic may be within their rights to
sue, I am angered that they would even consider using our courts to
prevent the public from speaking out on this critical issue.
Ultimately, they must answer to the court of public opinion, and it
is clear to me that they have made every attempt to build and open
this clinic under cover of darkness.
The writer represents the 68th District in
the S.C. House of Representatives.