GoUpstate.com

This is a printer friendly version of an article from www.goupstate.com
To print this article open the file menu and choose Print.

Back
Article published Dec 15, 2003
Lawmakers keep proposing small fixes but not systemic overhaul

The chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee has joined the governor and other lawmakers by proposing his ideas for adjusting the state's tax system.There is no shortage of ideas for adjusting, changing and tweaking the tax system. The General Assembly has adopted many of them over the past several years. Most have made the tax system worse, less stable and less equitable.But no one is offering what is really needed: the complete restructuring of the tax system, an overhaul with the goal of simplification and fairness.Rep. Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, wants to raise the state sales tax by an additional penny on the dollar and end some exemptions to the tax. He would use the revenue generated by this increase to eliminate vehicle property taxes and provide relief from homeowners' property taxes.Another pair of lawmakers, Republican Rick Quinn and Democrat Vince Sheheen, want to increase the sales tax by 2 cents on the dollar, eliminate the exemptions to the tax and use the money to end the portion of property taxes that supports schools.Sen. David Thomas, R-Fountain Inn, is pushing his own variation on this theme.Meanwhile, Gov. Mark Sanford wants to raise the state cigarette tax by 61 cents per pack and apply the state sales tax to lottery tickets. He would use that revenue to lower the state income tax.Other lawmakers want to increase the cigarette tax and use the money to pay for health programs.What's lost in all these competing ideas is a perspective on the harm that's been done by previous tinkering with the tax system.Former Gov. David Beasley convinced lawmakers to approve his homeowners' property tax relief measure. It cut property tax bills by providing a state subsidy. But lawmakers now struggle to fund the subsidy, and the distribution of the money has been corrupted to the point that it is no longer property tax relief. It is just another method of funding schools.Lawmakers wanted to create the appearance that they were addressing the hated vehicle property taxes, so they allowed voters to reduce the assessment on vehicles, planes and boats. Voters jumped on the offer but simply ended up paying more on their homes to make up for the lost revenue.Meanwhile, in order to attract more jobs, the state has shifted much of the tax burden from industry to small businesses and homeowners.And local governments are still primarily limited to the property tax as a method to raise their revenue.The state needs to scrap its complex tax system that has been burdened by lawmakers' Band-Aid approach to tax reform. It needs a complete overhaul to create a more simple system that gives local governments some flexibility, gives school districts equitable funding and doesn't overburden homeowners.