At the beginning of the session, Rep. Bobby Harrell, R-Charleston, had
the good idea to redirect as much as $90 million in gas tax money to the
Department of Transportation for the specific purpose of repairing
secondary roads. His proposal offered the added benefit of eliminating a
superfluous program that uses $15 million to clean up underground gas
tanks. Altogether it would have provided a modest fund for the repair of
secondary roads, generally acknowledged to be DOT's biggest problem.
But the bill that came back from the Senate provided about $35 million
to secondary roads, and kept the tank clean-up program intact. A like
amount will be directed to the State Infrastructure Bank where it is
expected to pay for bonds totaling some $300 million for new road
projects. The House agreed to the Senate changes as the session came to an
end. On Tuesday, both bodies overrode a gubernatorial veto.
Consequently, half of the increase realized by DOT will in all
likelihood be used to add road-miles to one of the nation's largest
state-maintained road systems, while the state can't maintain what it has.
No doubt, there are new road projects that need funding, but none is as
pressing as the long-deferred and under-funded maintenance of state roads.
The state has an annual deficit of more than $500 million in secondary
road repairs. Those projects aren't given adequate resources because the
state DOT uses gas tax revenue on projects for which federal road money
can be leveraged. Secondary roads aren't eligible for federal funding.
Meanwhile, the state's gasoline tax of 16 cents per gallon is one of
the lowest rates in the nation. Individual efforts in the Legislature to
raise the gas tax have failed to advance, despite the demonstrable need
for more road funds. Indeed, Rep. Harrell's plan almost died in the Senate
when Sen. Hugh Leatherman, R-Florence, amended the bill to increase the
gas tax by 7 cents a gallon. The senator's amendment was badly timed and
was eventually dropped. But it did recognize the need for more revenue for
secondary roads.
The Legislature would have done better to retain all revenues sought by
Rep. Harrell for road maintenance. Legislators clearly should have
eliminated funding for the underground tank program that their own
Legislative Audit Council said should have been terminated years ago.
In short, the Legislature should have kept the focus on road
maintenance, while developing the political will for a gas tax hike to
deal with road repairs more comprehensively. Next year is an election year
-- never a good time for any tax increase.
The motoring public had better hope that the Audit Council's
performance review of the DOT suggests major economies that will allow
more resources to be directed to the repair of the state's crumbling
secondary roads.