Political appointees should have to disclose contributions
they've made to candidates for public office, S.C. House Democratic
leader James Smith said Tuesday.
Smith, of Columbia, will announce today that he's introducing
legislation to require anyone appointed to a state board or
commission to reveal political contributions made within the past
four years.
"Change needs to be made," Smith said.
The proposal is in response to a Sunday story in The State
newspaper, Smith said. The report showed that nearly half of the
people Gov. Mark Sanford has appointed to state boards, commissions
or agency leadership posts were campaign donors.
Sanford declined to comment. He said last week that whether
someone made a campaign contribution was one factor used in choosing
appointees.
Smith's bill would apply to all appointments, not just those made
by the governor. The House and Senate also appoint members of some
state boards and commissions.
Smith is still working on some specifics, such as how exactly
appointees would reveal contributions.
The proposal will be taken up when the Legislature returns in
January.
House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, said he and his
Republican colleagues believe in disclosure when it comes to
campaign cash, but he isn't sure Smith's step is necessary.
Contributions already must be disclosed by the candidate, he
said.
"A great deal of this information is already available," he said.
"I hope this is not just an attempt to politicize appointments by
the governor of a different party. "
Smith said his proposal is not a partisan attack.
"That is not the point," he said. "I do think the governor
provides a shining example of why this needs to be changed."
It is a worthwhile effort, said John Crangle, director of the
S.C. chapter of Common Cause, a Washington-based government watchdog
group.
"The public has a right to know, and I don't think it's too much
of a burden on these people," Crangle said.
But Wilkins said the public already has access to the
information, and he's sure more attention will be paid to these
issues in the future.
"Questions like that are probably going to be more prevalent
now," he said.