NewsShopsAutosJobsJacksonvilleCharlestonBeaufortSavannahAtlantaAthensGreenvilleCharlotteColumbiaAugusta

home

news

obits

classifieds

cityguide

columnists

weather

services

marketplace

search

sitemap

contactus



Advertisers







Mostly Cloudy • 87° • from the SSE at 9 MPH • Extended Forecast Here
Local News Web posted Tuesday, June 10, 2003

Editorial: Chalk up another win for DUI lawyers

Carolina Morning News

Tracking the last-minute passage of the state's new DUI law gives a great deal of insight into the dysfunction that reigned during the 2003 General Assembly.

The bill could have conceivably saved lives in the nation's second most deadly state for drunken driving deaths. Instead, it became a watered-down, unenforceable excuse for the state to retain its federal highway funding.

In short, it does nothing to get drunken drivers off the state's roads.

A thoughtful DUI bill was introduced in the House by Rep. JoAnne Gilham, R-Hilton Head Island, two years ago. That bill was finally addressed this year, just in time to meet a deadline established by the federal government, which wants states to get serious about DUI laws.

The bill lowers the "per se" limit for drunken driving, making it a crime to drive with a blood alcohol content over .08. The current limit is .10. ("Per se" means that no evidence other than the results of a properly obtained chemical test are required for conviction.)

The House of Representatives did the right thing and passed the bill. The Senate hemmed and hawed, as it did on so many issues this session, and passed a watered-down version of the bill only minutes before the legislators adjourned in their last session of the year on Thursday.

Their version, however, contains so many loopholes that "per se" drunken driving will still be only a dream for the police officers, deputies and highway patrol troopers who do their best to serve and protect their communities.

A good "per se" case, for example, now requires "articulable suspicion," whatever that means. The new law, like the old, does not apply in cases that arise out of traffic roadblocks or diver's license checkpoints. There are other loopholes, but you get the idea.

Gilham summed it up nicely: "The DUI attorneys won again."

The bill could be revisited next year and fine-tuned, but that is not likely. In the minds of the state's lawmakers, this battle has been waged and those who oppose tougher DUI laws have won.

We wonder how they sleep at night.

Events:
June

S M T W T F S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10 11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30





click on date

Local News

• Police have 2.5-ton tool

• Budget crunch time

• Gilham blasts weak DUI lawmaking

• Men used fake Social Security numbers to get benefits

• County administrator's condition improves

• Shelter pets in need of hurricane helpers

• Editorial: Chalk up another win for DUI lawyers

• Letter to the Editor: The definition or racism has changed

• Letter to the Editor: Politicians just trolling for votes

• Bremer: Local businesses give us a home-town feel

• Harrell: Lawns are a pain in the grass

• Vox Carolina

• Traffic briefs

• Upcoming events

• Lowcountry calendar




Features
Coastal Autos

Coastal Golf

Worldcom Classic

Football NOW

SEC Fanatic




Copyright 2002 Carolina Morning News. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.
Optimized for 800x600 screen resolution.