Bill on judgeships
for blacks altered Significant
revisions made to House proposal intended to change way S.C. selects
judges By RICK
BRUNDRETT Staff
Writer
A Senate Judiciary subcommittee Wednesday substantially altered a
House bill that supporters say would help increase the number of
black judges statewide.
The House bill eliminates the three-person cap on nominees for
state Supreme Court, Court of Appeals, administrative law, circuit
and family court seats.
The Senate version, which passed by a voice vote of three
subcommittee members, raises the cap to six instead of removing it
altogether. It also requires that two-thirds of present judicial
screening committee members agree to open nominations beyond the
first three.
In addition, it eliminates a controversial House provision that
would make it easier for lawmakers to run for judgeships. It also
requires that all screening committee votes be recorded and open to
the public.
The Senate version essentially allows the 10-member Judicial
Merit Selection Commission, made up mostly of lawmakers, to retain
its nominating powers. The House bill, by eliminating the cap, puts
more decision-making responsibility on the Legislature, which elects
the judges.
Only five days remain in the legislative session for the amended
House bill to pass the full Senate and get back to the House.
Sen. Tommy Moore, D-Aiken, chairman of the Senate Judiciary
subcommittee and a judicial screening committee member, said the
Senate’s second reading of the bill could come today, with the final
reading possibly on Tuesday — two days before the session’s end.
Rep. Leon Howard, D-Richland, who sponsored the House bill, said
he isn’t happy with the Senate changes to his legislation.
“It’s better than nothing, but it’s certainly not the best we can
do,” said Howard, who is black. “I held my nose to agree to moving
(the cap) to six.”
Howard said he opposes the other Senate provision that requires a
separate vote for the committee to consider nominating more than
three candidates.
Michael Couick, chief lawyer for the screening committee, said
during the hearing that before the cap took effect in 1997,
judgeships were “brokered” among lawmakers “years in advance.”
“It was known who was going to be the winner before (the
screening) was ever opened,” he said, noting he was speaking on
behalf of Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell, the Senate
Judiciary Committee chairman and vice chairman of the screening
committee.
Black lawmakers are angry that no blacks were elected to state
court seats this year. In an election Tuesday for a Court of Appeals
seat, Circuit Judge Casey Manning of Columbia, who is black, lost to
Circuit Judge Paul Short of Chester, who is white. Black Circuit
Judge Alison Lee of Columbia did not get nominated for that
seat.
Black legislators say the nominee cap has prevented black
candidates from getting nominated and has discouraged others from
running. They contend all qualified candidates should have the
opportunity to get elected in the Legislature.
A study published Monday by The State found that two-thirds of
black candidates since 1998 in contested races with more than three
candidates were rejected by the judicial screening committee.
Reach Brundrett at (803) 771-8484 or rbrundrett@thestate.com. |