Don't serve alcohol to minors

(Published September 12‚ 2005)

Adults who knowingly supply beer to underage drinkers need to wise up in light of a new approach on the part of the state Supreme Court.

The court recently made it clear that adults can be held liable for damages caused after they serve alcohol to minors at parties. The court stated that imposing liability on "social hosts" encourages a more responsible effort on the part of hosts to police who is being served alcohol at their parties.

State law makes it illegal to serve alcohol to people younger than 21. Past decisions by the court have held that adults acting as hosts were not necessarily responsible for deaths or injuries resulting from serving alcohol to other adults.

That, we think, continues to be a sensible approach. While hosts should make every effort to keep guests from drinking too much and, especially, from driving after they have had too much to drink, they should not be held liable in most cases for another adult's actions.

But the issue is different where underage drinkers are concerned. First, adults are committing a crime when they serve alcohol to those under 21 -- and that includes the 21-year-old who supplies alcohol to his 20-year-old friend. Second, the court has determined that people younger than 21 "are incompetent by reason of their youth and inexperience to deal responsibly with the effects of alcohol." That means that while an intoxicated 18-year-old might not be competent, those who knowingly served him the alcohol can be held responsible for injuries or deaths caused by that 18-year-old because they are capable of recognizing the hazards.

And while some might disagree with the court's age-of-competency assessment, it's the law. In practical terms, adults have to consider the potential for huge economic liabilities if they serve underage people alcohol and an accident ensues.

The court ruled recently on one case involving a 19-year-old man who had been drinking at a company Christmas party and died in a head-on crash with another car, whose driver also was killed. The court upheld a $750,000 verdict for the victim's family against the company where the drinks were served.

This could have a profound effect on how adults conduct events such as graduation parties and barbecues. It is common for hosts to turn a blind eye if teenagers have a drink or two at these get-togethers. But adults now need to carefully consider the possible consequences of doing that.

The essential question to ask yourself: Is it worth the risk?

IN SUMMARY

New state Supreme Court opinion highlights dangers of serving alcohol to underage drinkers.

Copyright © 2005 The Herald, Rock Hill, South Carolina