President Bush's failed last-ditch effort in Virginia to save the
Republican gubernatorial candidacy of Jerry Kilgore wasn't lost on
some Republican House members who'll face the voters next year.
Nearly two weeks later, Bush's poll numbers are at another new
low among voters anxious over the Iraq war, energy costs and soaring
budget deficits.
With the GOP's slender U.S. House majority on the line next year,
some incumbents are beginning to see linkage to the president as a
liability to their political futures.
Rep. J.D. Hayworth, the 1981-86 WYFF-TV sportscaster who won a
House seat in a conservative Arizona district in 1994, is bailing
out.
Advertisement
|
 |
Asked 10 days back on the Don Imus radio talk show whether he'd
welcome Bush at his side in next year's campaign, Hayworth said,
when pinned down after some hemming and hawing:
"In a word, no. Not at this time." Distancing game
Hours later, Hayworth's office put out a statement saying the
congressman would "do all I can to help the president turn things
around" by Nov. 7, 2006.
Hayworth said his comment to Imus was "just a realistic
assessment of where the president is politically at this time."
No "y'all come" in that.
Last week, Connecticut's Republican governor, Jodi Rell, declared
there was no need for Bush to campaign with her. Granted, Bush is
hardly a good fit with moderate New England Republicans, who are
liberals compared to their Southern brethren.
Still, is there a trend here?
The University of Virginia's Larry Sabato writes in his current
Internet newsletter that "President Bush and the Republicans are in
deep trouble in 2005."
Not necessarily in South Carolina, although there is some caution
out there.
This state's Republican congressmen, perhaps among the safest of
the safe, say they'd welcome Bush next year.
But South Carolina may not be the "Bush country" it has been
since the current president's father swept the state in 1988.
While Sabato says there's no certainty that the GOP's Nov. 8
"calamities" in Virginia and New Jersey will carry over into 2006,
there is equally no reason they won't be "spot on" predictors.
Sliding numbers
PollingReport.com lists 10 national polls showing generic
Republicans running from minus 5 points to minus 12 points in
respondents' preferences in 2006 congressional elections. The
CNN-USA Today poll has a 37-52 GOP deficit.
Those same 10 polls, conducted Oct. 30-Nov. 13, show Bush's
approval ratings ranging from 36 percent to 45 percent and
disapproval running from 47 percent to 60 percent.
Survey USA's September South Carolina poll showed a 47-51
approval-disapproval rating, but a month later, those numbers had
plunged to 40-58.
Other Republicans fared better. Gov. Mark Sanford was 49-43, Sen.
Lindsey Graham, 58-32, and Sen. Jim DeMint, 47-41.
These are definitely not good times for the president.
But if a few are bailing out elsewhere, South Carolina's welcome
mat remains in place.
Republicans who might most be affected by public disapproval of
the administration are standing pat. State standing firm
Katon Dawson, the state GOP chairman, never misses an opportunity
to defend the president and reaffirm the state party's loyalty.
Ditto the U.S. House delegation, whose members will face voters
in 50 weeks.
Rep. Bob Inglis of Greenville, ensconced again in the 4th
District, says he would welcome Bush, but has a cautionary note.
"The president has suffered some real declines in his polling
numbers, and that shows how fleeting poll approval is," Inglis said,
pointing out that Bush has gone from off the charts on the positive
side after 9-11 to among the lowest ever for a sitting president.
Rep. Gresham Barrett of Westminster has "not lost confidence in
my president."
"Look at what he's had to deal with -- the recession, 9-11, the
war on terror, Katrina and now he's dealing with the deficit, Social
Security, Medicare, Medicaid -- none of these things he'd been
directly involved in, but unfortunately, the bill's coming due,"
Barrett said.
"When the president's numbers get bad in places like South
Carolina, then he does have a major problem, but so far I haven't
seen that," Barrett said.
Rep. Joe Wilson of Lexington is even more effusive. 'Come now!'
"I hope he can come here right away, and I hope he comes next
year, and I'm confident we will be having him campaign in South
Carolina next year," Wilson said.
Rep. Henry Brown of Charleston couldn't be reached for comment,
but has been a strong Bush ally.
Democrats, perhaps sensing a rare wedge issue that might play for
them, see a potential opening in Bush's travails, even in South
Carolina.
"Voters are not going to react well to Republican incumbents who
don't show separation from the administration," said Lachlan
McIntosh, executive director of the state Democratic Party. "For the
first time in a while, congressional Republicans are going to have
to stand on their own two feet." Bottomed out?
For Dave Woodard, a Clemson University political scientist and
GOP consultant-pollster, Bush bottomed out two weeks ago "when
(White House strategist) Karl Rove wasn't indicted" by a federal
grand jury probing a leak of CIA operative's name.
The U.S. Supreme Court nomination of Joseph Alito, an apparent
strict constructionist, helped stem the slide by bringing back
disaffected conservatives, Woodard said.
"Just because Republicans are distancing themselves from him now
doesn't mean they might not change their minds next fall. Of course,
it could stay bad, but I don't see this as being as bad as
Iran-Contra and impeachment ... both of which afflicted previous
presidents," Woodard said. |