Court: City wrongly
tallied taxes Justices call for
refund; MB says money already returned By Zane Wilson The Sun News
Myrtle Beach used illegal methods to calculate property taxes in
1998, the state Supreme Court ruled Monday in a five-year-old case
filed by former Horry County Administrator Linda Angus.
The 3-2 ruling almost brings to an end the dispute about tax
calculations that began with the 1998 countywide reassessment, but
it could have an effect on how cities and counties statewide figure
their taxes.
The court sent the case back to the lower courts to determine how
to repay the overcharge.
But it already has been paid, Myrtle Beach spokesman Mark
Kruea.
The city refunded the $500,000 overcharge to taxpayers the next
year, he said.
"It's a disappointing decision," Kruea said. "The high court was
split 3-2, and we'll certainly ask for a rehearing."
The lawsuit by Angus, who lived in the city, began with tax
calculations after the 1998 reassessment. State law does not allow
local governments to get a windfall from rising property values, so
they must readjust their tax rates.
In setting its rates, the city estimated it would receive 86
percent of the tax payments because some people do not pay.
Instead, the city received 88 percent of the levy.
The city said it was acting on the advice of the state Department
of Revenue and doing what most cities and counties do to develop a
budget. Taxes never come in at a 100 percent level, the city
said.
The Supreme Court decision, written by Associate Justice James
Moore, said the city could have held a hearing and voted to raise
taxes, but it did not.
The lower court was wrong to say the city's actions were
reasonable, the opinion said.
"The variables permitted by the statute are clear and
unambiguous; regardless of the merit of Myrtle Beach's formula, it
is not what the statute allows," the court wrote.
In a dissenting opinion, Associate Justice Costa Pleicones said,
"The reality of municipal budgeting is that it is an inexact
science, relying as it must upon estimates and 'best guesses.'"
Kruea said that if cities and counties must calculate taxes as if
100 percent will be paid, they will be forced to raise millage rates
and collect more than they need to be sure to bring in enough to
cover the budget.
They would have to repay any overcharge the next year.
"It really puts budgeting in an up-and-down roller coaster,"
Kruea said.
He also said that because the city already paid the money back,
he isn't sure what a hearing on that issue will accomplish.
Lawyers for Angus could not be reached, nor could a spokesman for
the S.C. Municipal Association.
About the
case
Former Horry County Administrator Linda Angus, who lived in
Myrtle Beach, sued the city in 2000 over its method of property-tax
calculations after countywide reassessment.
The next year, the judge agreed to make the case a class action
on behalf of all taxpayers in the city.
The circuit court ruled in the city's favor in 2003, and Angus
appealed.
The state high court heard the case June 10 and ruled 3-2 Monday
that Angus was correct.
The Supreme Court ordered the case heard in circuit court to
determine refunds and how they will be paid.
The state Supreme Court ruled Monday in a five-year-old case
filed by former Horry County Administrator Linda Angus that Myrtle
Beach used illegal methods to calculate property taxes in 1998.
|