Lawmakers seem to agree schools should be allowed to shift money
around to patch budget holes between now and June 30.
But they can't decide whether teachers should be exempt from
furloughs as a cost-saving tactic.
House members left Columbia Thursday unable to resolve the
question, leaving cash-strapped school districts in limbo over how
to pay bills over the next four months.
Midyear budget cuts totaling roughly 8.5 percent have educators
worried about meeting their obligations, including payroll.
Superintendent Keith Callicutt told Newberry County's school
board this week his district faces an $897,000 deficit and could be
$1.6 million in the red when he begins writing next year's
budget.
Callicutt named a committee to help him decide the fate of
Whitmire High School, which next fall will have a projected
enrollment of 150 students.
Rep. John Scott, D-Richland, fears other school systems face the
same dilemma. "It's pretty bad out there," he said. "I'm really
concerned about the impact on our smaller districts."
Rep. Ronny Townsend and Sen. Larry Martin, both Upstate
Republicans, stepped forward Feb. 18 with a bailout proposal to
relax rules dictating how schools must spend money state government
provides for education.
Both believe "spending flexibility" resolutions will enable
school districts to redirect state money into accounts that will
keep them solvent. The measures would allow school systems to order
furloughs -- time-off without pay -- but only as a final option.
Townsend is adamant that local trustees should decide how and
when to order furloughs. Martin agrees, but Senate Democrats
insisted his resolution protect teachers.
An amended Senate measure, which has the support of the state's
largest teachers' organization, requires administrators to take five
days off before a local school board can order teachers to do the
same. All told, the Senate proposal says administrators could be
docked up to 10 days' pay, and teachers, a maximum of five days'
pay.
Townsend wanted to strip that language from the Senate version
this week and replace it with less restrictive wording that treats
all school employees equally when making furlough decisions.
House members on both sides of the aisle were uneasy over a
potential backlash over legislation that might force teachers from
the classroom during the school year.
Speaker David Wilkins adjourned the House for the week before
members could debate a compromise put forth by Rep. Harry Ott. The
Calhoun Democrat said he'll offer an amendment next week to make
teachers the last group of employees susceptible to furloughs.
"We should try to do everything possible to keep these kids in
class and learning," Ott said.
Wilkins, R-Greenville, said he allowed debate to stop just before
noon Thursday because he realized House members' stamina was
fading.
"I thought it justified another hour of debate," he said. The
measure will be rescheduled for a vote next Tuesday.
Rep. Bob Walker, R-Spartanburg, was visibly angry when colleagues
voted to adjourn.
"We needed to get this done (Thursday)," Walker said. "The
schools need our help, and they need it right away. Some of them
can't wait too much longer. They're in a crisis."