We're relieved that
state lawmakers appear to be able to distinguish
between legitimate sporting and hunting events
involving animals and staged animal fights.
The state Senate recently approved a bill that
would ban hog-dogging, where dogs trained to be
aggressive are set loose on penned hogs, often
boars that have had their tusks removed. While
those involved in hog-dogging claim that it is
simply a sport as well as a method of training
dogs to hunt feral hogs, betting often is
involved, indicating this is simply a bloody
spectacle, not a real sport of any kind.
A number of states, most of them Southern
states, already have banned hog-dogging and others
have legislation pending. In South Carolina, the
House still must approve the ban before it becomes
law.
We hope lawmakers don't succumb to the argument
that hog-dogging is a long-time Southern tradition
worth preserving. One of those pressing that
argument is Rep. Greg Delleney, R-Chester. He said
he fears that a ban would be a foot in the door
for animal rights activists who are bent on
banning hunting and any sport involving animals.
That, we think, is alarmist thinking. Other
states have effectively banned hog-dogging without
encroaching on the rights of hunters or other
sportsmen.
In fact, the bill passed by the Senate
specifically exempts coon, fox or bear hunting
from its restrictions, focussing solely on
contests involving dogs that harm or kill animals,
thereby profiting owners.
Hog-dogging and other activities that clearly
are cruel to the animals involved are an unfit
practice in civilized society. We hope lawmakers
in the House give final approval to this ban.
IN SUMMARY |
Hog-dogging is not a legitimate sport, and
lawmakers should support bill that bans it.
|