Many proposals, no
consensus Individuals, groups push
competing plans for resolving S.C. financial
woes By VALERIE
BAUERLEIN Staff
Writer
With just six weeks left in the 2003
legislative session, the State House was awash on Tuesday with ideas
— but very little accord — on how to settle the state's budget
crisis:
• Lt. Gov. Andre Bauer clashed with Gov. Mark Sanford.
• Republican legislators stood behind a scathing education
spending report that teachers trashed.
• Even taxpayers' associations were at odds over the state budget
mess — and whether to raise taxes to get out of it.
The only thing that was clear was that the budget debate is
boiling.
The bottom line: The state will not bring in enough tax money
next year to pay for services at this year's level — from schools to
prisons to the DMV.
That crunch means either cutting spending — and services — or
raising taxes.
Last month, the House passed a $5.1 billion budget that would cut
most state agencies and reduce per-pupil funding of schools to 1995
levels.
So far, the Senate has said that won't do.
The Senate Finance Committee passed its own $5.4 billion plan
last week that would eliminate key sales tax exemptions, including a
$300 cap on cars. This and other changes are expected to raise
per-student spending to $1,900, below the $2,201 that education
leaders say is needed, but above the House number of $1,643.
The committee also would raise the tax on cigarettes by 53 cents
a pack to help pay for the Medicaid health care program for the poor
— in exchange for lowering the income tax when the economy improves.
Enter Gov. Sanford. He wants a plan that looks more like the
Senate's, but with emphasis on health care, not schools. His
ultimate goal — to raise the taxes on cigarettes to offset growth in
Medicaid. In exchange, he'd lower the income tax over time.
"What I've heard resoundingly from people is that they would like
to see this kind of change," he said.
The Senate is scheduled to take up the budget this week. The
Senate and the House will negotiate their differences in the budget
in the coming weeks, before sending it to Sanford to sign by June 5,
the end of the session. It takes effect July 1.
One potential solution to the wrangling is the "Quinn plan,"
being pushed by House Majority Leader Rick Quinn, R-Richland — who
isn't saying much about it.
Quinn said he and a bipartisan group of legislators are working
out details, but he wants to see a fundamental shift in how the
state funds education.
Traditionally, schools have relied on local property taxes to pay
the bulk of their costs. This pits property owners against kids,
Quinn said. It also means schools in wealthier areas have stronger
schools.
"We ought to make it so that every child, no matter where they
live, no matter who their daddy is, gets a good education," Quinn
said.
Raising the sales tax and lowering the property tax is an option.
"Anything is on the table," he said.
Dueling budget news conferences competed for attention Tuesday:
• Lt. Gov. Bauer gathered 350 business owners, hoteliers,
anti-tax advocates and others to decry raising taxes of any kind.
"Government right now is finding it extremely difficult to make
ends meet," he said, "but South Carolina citizens are finding it
even harder to make ends meet. I'm here today to say now is not the
time for a tax increase."
Bauer — who could only cast a vote on the budget in case of a tie
in the Senate — was surrounded by cheering supporters, including car
dealers, who are spending time and money to fight the Senate's
proposal to raise the $300 sales tax cap on automobiles.
• The S.C. Policy Council called for an audit of education
spending. The council's analysis shows only 50 percent of state and
federal funds for education go to the classroom, president Ed
McMullen said.
"There is no excuse for this in South Carolina," McMullen said.
House Speaker David Wilkins, R-Greenville, and a dozen Republican
legislators backed McMullen at the podium.
"This is all about priorities," Wilkins said.
• The education community's reaction to that critique was swift.
Elizabeth Gressette, who heads the Palmetto State Teachers
Association, called the Policy Council "misguided." The organization
used numbers from 2001 that don't reflect midyear and other cuts,
she said. The study also did not count guidance counselors,
libraries and librarians or after-school programs as classroom
costs, she added.
The state Department of Education put out a two-page memo
offering retorts or contradictions to many of the points the Policy
Council made.
• Gov. Sanford held his own news conference, flanked by
small-business representatives. Some dealt in mattresses, pizza or
plumbing; some were state and local Chamber of Commerce leaders.
Sanford said he was "guardedly optimistic" about the coming weeks
of budget wrangling. He is challenging the General Assembly to pass
his plan to swap lowering the income tax with raising the cigarette
tax. That would show the state that fundamental tax reform has a
future.
"If you can't trade off a cigarette tax in exchange for a tax
decrease, I don't know how you pull off any of the other more
difficult plans out there."
Staff writer Bill Robinson contributed to this
report. |