Where Daniel Morgan and Banastre Tarleton fought to determine the
course of this country almost 225 years ago, Pat Ruff and Oliver
Buckles are fighting fescue grass and honeysuckle to preserve
history.
Ruff, chief ranger at Cowpens National Battlefield, and Buckles,
working under a contract with the National Park Service, have taken
the first steps toward returning the landscape to its botanical
condition during the pivotal Revolutionary War battle in 1781.
That work entails scouring official reports and personal diaries
from participants in the battle for descriptions of the plants and
topography, testing soil samples for hints of past vegetation and
making plenty of educated guesses.
The project is the first attempt to make a major Revolutionary
War battlefield in the South botanically accurate, Ruff said.
Similar efforts have been done at Civil War battlefields at
Gettysburg and Antietam.
At Gettysburg, the Park Service has built dozens of fence lines
and planted 16,000 shrubs since 1999 to recreate a thicket pivotal
in the battle. At Cowpens and Gettysburg, the goal is not just to
make history come alive, but to make it come alive in a more
authentic setting.
“It’s a fascinating story, and we have to find a way to make that
story as accurate as possible,” Ruff said. “(Tourists and history
buffs) can go to Disneyland and get that Disney kind of
experience.
“But how many places can you go to in the quiet and the solitude
and understand the history like this?”
‘BUT WHICH PEA VINE?’
The Battle of Cowpens, fought on Jan. 17, 1781, proved to be a
decisive encounter in the American Revolution.
Morgan threw a one-two punch of volunteer militia followed by
trained Continental troops at Tarleton’s British troops. The
resounding American victory came just a few months after an equally
demoralizing British defeat at Kings Mountain and spelled doom for
Britain’s Southern Campaign.
Nine months later, British commander Gen. Charles Cornwallis
surrendered at Yorktown.
The Cowpens battlefield, in northwestern Cherokee County, has
been a contemplative gathering spot for years. The first 1½ acres of
the current park were purchased by the government in 1929. The
purchase of 845 acres in the 1960s led to the opening of the current
battlefield park in 1978.
Nearly 200,000 people flow through the park’s gates each year,
walking a paved trail with signs that explain the Battle of Cowpens.
They find the same ridges and creeks that Morgan and Tarleton
maneuvered across 223 years ago. But where cavalry horses galloped
through the forest and across the cow pasture unimpeded, visitors
encountered vegetation so thick in areas that it was impossible to
see through it.
As part of a nationwide fire-prevention project, the National
Park Service two years ago hired a contractor to remove much of the
flammable understory, the brush and small trees below the main
canopy of the dominant trees. Improving the physical accuracy of the
battlefield has been part of the park’s long-range plan. Removing
the understory dove-tailed with that historical quest.
The Park Service decided to devote an extra $25,000 to get the
ecological accuracy effort started this year. Buckles, who was
directing the understory removal for the Palmetto Conservation
Foundation, took on the secondary role of returning the battlefield
to its 1781 appearance.
It’s been alternately fun and frustrating for Buckles, who worked
for the U.S. Forestry Service for years. Now, he is melding forestry
and historical research on the Revolutionary War era.
“You find a lot of references to the cattle getting fat on pea
vine, but which pea vine?” Buckles said. “It would be nice if they
had used the scientific names.
“They frequently refer to the sparse canopy of trees, but one of
the things we’re wrestling with is what was that density.”
RECREATING A PIEDMONT PRAIRIE
Most of the battlefield was clear cut by farmers in the 1800s,
and some areas have been timbered even more recently. A few of the
towering oaks might be 100 years old, Buckles said, but there aren’t
any “witness trees” that were on the property in 1781.
On the other hand, plenty of species on the property now almost
certainly weren’t there during the Revolution. Loblolly pines
weren’t common in the area back in the 1780s, but they are now,
Buckles said. The magnolias planted around a battle monument belong
on the coastal plain.
Non-native species — fescue grass, Japanese honeysuckle and
privet bush — abound. Local gardeners can attest to the difficulty
in getting rid of those plants. Buckles plans to pull, dig and, if
necessary, spray herbicides to kill the pesky visitors.
Then, he wants to re-introduce plants common in the Piedmont
prairie system that would have dominated the area in the 1700s —
downy oat grass, split beard, plume grass.
One of the intriguing aspects of the project is that the
battlefield wasn’t typical of the natural environment of its period.
It had been cleared by grazing cattle or fire, or both. For true
accuracy, researchers have to determine which local grasses dealt
best with those types of disturbances.
York County naturalist James Barnwell and Winthrop University
biology professor John Schmidt are studying five small plots on the
property in an attempt to solve that mystery.
One important addition to the battlefield will be Arundinaria
gigantea, or common cane. This thin-stalked plant, still found in
wet areas near the battlefield, played a major role in the skirmish.
British troops had to maneuver around large clumps of the plant
called canebrakes. Buckles wants to replant canebrakes on what
currently is a wide-open section of the site.
NO COWS OR BULLS, BUT ‘BABY STEPS’
Correcting the trees should be easier, though it will take much
longer. Historical documents make specific references to tree lines
in the battle strategy and in the areas where troops camped.
“The land was thickly covered with red oak and hickory, with
little if any underbrush,” wrote Samuel Hammond, a Patriot militia
leader from Virginia.
Other participants described an open savanna to the right of the
main British line. Today, several trees break up that open area. For
accuracy, they should be cut.
Researchers pinpointed where Morgan’s troops camped among mature
trees. That area has few large trees now. More should be
planted.
Battle histories report much of the wooded area was so open that
cavalry riders could raise their hands without hitting overhead tree
limbs. Lower limbs should be trimmed in some areas.
However, the National Park Service has balked at recreating one
important historical aspect. To truly return the landscape to its
1781 status, the Park Service might need to reintroduce cattle.
After all, when the call went out for militia members to “meet at
the cow pens,” the reference was to a large cattle pasture. (The
cattle had cleared out before the battle, but they helped create the
environment.)
Buckles said it will be difficult to mimic the impact of cattle
on the battlefield with mowing, but the National Park Service
doesn’t need the headache of people mixing with cows and bulls.
Most of the $25,000 allotted to the project is going to research
and preparation. The park can’t afford to plant large trees, so it’s
going with seedlings.
“We’re trying to take baby steps that are meaningful baby steps,”
Ruff said.
While park visitors already will notice the understory has been
cleaned out of some areas, the full project is a long way from
completion. It won’t be finished until those seedlings reach
maturity.
“This is going to take 50 years,” Buckles said. “We’re doing this
for our children and our children’s children.”
Reach Holleman at (803) 771-8366 or jholleman@thestate.com.